Exploring Practical, Disciplinary, and Engineering Reasoning in a High School Technology Classroom
Saved in:
| Title: | Exploring Practical, Disciplinary, and Engineering Reasoning in a High School Technology Classroom |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mathew Thomas (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2026 14(2):639-655. |
| Availability: | International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. Necmettin Erbakan University, Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, Meram, Konya, 42090, Turkey. e-mail: ijermst@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/index |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Secondary School Students, Technology Education, Thinking Skills, Abstract Reasoning, Student Projects, Design, Engineering, Concept Formation, Learning Processes, Interdisciplinary Approach, Mathematics |
| ISSN: | 2147-611X |
| Abstract: | This paper presents how students in a secondary school technology classroom navigated different forms of reasoning during the early stages of a design project to build gravity-powered street luges. The data collection methods included classroom observations, examining student artefacts, teacher interviews, and focus group discussions with students, the analysis identified three modes of reasoning, practical (trial-and-error), disciplinary (use of science and mathematics), and engineering (conceptual design integration). Findings show that students predominantly relied on practical reasoning early on in the project, with disciplinary concepts often referenced at a surface level. Engineering reasoning emerged later especially when triggered by testing failures or design constraints. This paper contributes to understanding how conceptual learning can be fostered through design-based activity and offers implications for strengthening interdisciplinary thinking in technology education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1506044 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1506044 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1506044 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Exploring Practical, Disciplinary, and Engineering Reasoning in a High School Technology Classroom – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathew+Thomas%22">Mathew Thomas</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4483-1441">0009-0005-4483-1441</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Education+in+Mathematics%2C+Science+and+Technology%22"><i>International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology</i></searchLink>. 2026 14(2):639-655. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. Necmettin Erbakan University, Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, Meram, Konya, 42090, Turkey. e-mail: ijermst@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/index – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Education%22">Technology Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Abstract+Reasoning%22">Abstract Reasoning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design%22">Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+Approach%22">Interdisciplinary Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2147-611X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper presents how students in a secondary school technology classroom navigated different forms of reasoning during the early stages of a design project to build gravity-powered street luges. The data collection methods included classroom observations, examining student artefacts, teacher interviews, and focus group discussions with students, the analysis identified three modes of reasoning, practical (trial-and-error), disciplinary (use of science and mathematics), and engineering (conceptual design integration). Findings show that students predominantly relied on practical reasoning early on in the project, with disciplinary concepts often referenced at a surface level. Engineering reasoning emerged later especially when triggered by testing failures or design constraints. This paper contributes to understanding how conceptual learning can be fostered through design-based activity and offers implications for strengthening interdisciplinary thinking in technology education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1506044 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1506044 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 639 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Abstract Reasoning Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Projects Type: general – SubjectFull: Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Type: general – SubjectFull: Concept Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Exploring Practical, Disciplinary, and Engineering Reasoning in a High School Technology Classroom Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mathew Thomas IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2147-611X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |