View in EDS

University System of Georgia Uses FPI to Support Its Internal Evaluation Process

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: University System of Georgia Uses FPI to Support Its Internal Evaluation Process
Language: English
Authors: Kinnaman, Maggie, Hunter, Ernest R.,, Adams, Greg
Source: Facilities Manager. Nov-Dec 2009 25(6):23-27.
Availability: APPA: Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers. 1643 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Tel: 703-684-1446; Fax: 703-543-2772; e-mail: appa@appa.org; Web site: http://www.appa.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 5
Publication Date: 2009
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Evaluation, Facility Inventory, Training, Teleconferencing, Computation, Costs, Construction Programs, Educational Facilities Planning, Distance Education, Cost Effectiveness, Surveys
Geographic Terms: Georgia
ISSN: 0882-7249
Abstract: APPA's Facilities Performance Indicators (FPI) Survey and Report has grown from 190 institutions to a survey reflecting the input of 225 institutions, another 36 institutions preparing to participate in the survey, and 150 institutions that participated in a customized utility consortium survey through a partnership between APPA and the Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC). History has shown that momentum around the survey will build as new resources and tools are embraced by APPA's members. Additionally, the Express/Detailed survey options built into the survey framework allows participants to choose their areas of interest to focus on. Finally, the new structure of the survey and report utilizes an Essential Questions format, which allows the ratios and performance indicators to reveal unique results for each institution. APPA also created a series of webinars and an FPI Advisor team to help assist institutions with the completion of the survey and interpretation of the report. A highly successful approach that has been employed is to reach out to those cohorts who have the desire to complete the survey and interpret the results together. This past year, the authors have worked extensively with 36 institutions of the University System of Georgia. The results of this initiative are presented in this article.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2011
Access URL: https://www.appa.org/FacilitiesManager/index.cfm?ItemNumber=2578
Accession Number: EJ920053
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ920053
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ920053
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: University System of Georgia Uses FPI to Support Its Internal Evaluation Process
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kinnaman%2C+Maggie%22">Kinnaman, Maggie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hunter%2C+Ernest+R%2E%2C%22">Hunter, Ernest R.,</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adams%2C+Greg%22">Adams, Greg</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Facilities+Manager%22"><i>Facilities Manager</i></searchLink>. Nov-Dec 2009 25(6):23-27.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: APPA: Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers. 1643 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Tel: 703-684-1446; Fax: 703-543-2772; e-mail: appa@appa.org; Web site: http://www.appa.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 5
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2009
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Facility+Inventory%22">Facility Inventory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Training%22">Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teleconferencing%22">Teleconferencing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computation%22">Computation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Costs%22">Costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construction+Programs%22">Construction Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Facilities+Planning%22">Educational Facilities Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Georgia%22">Georgia</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0882-7249
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: APPA's Facilities Performance Indicators (FPI) Survey and Report has grown from 190 institutions to a survey reflecting the input of 225 institutions, another 36 institutions preparing to participate in the survey, and 150 institutions that participated in a customized utility consortium survey through a partnership between APPA and the Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC). History has shown that momentum around the survey will build as new resources and tools are embraced by APPA's members. Additionally, the Express/Detailed survey options built into the survey framework allows participants to choose their areas of interest to focus on. Finally, the new structure of the survey and report utilizes an Essential Questions format, which allows the ratios and performance indicators to reveal unique results for each institution. APPA also created a series of webinars and an FPI Advisor team to help assist institutions with the completion of the survey and interpretation of the report. A highly successful approach that has been employed is to reach out to those cohorts who have the desire to complete the survey and interpret the results together. This past year, the authors have worked extensively with 36 institutions of the University System of Georgia. The results of this initiative are presented in this article.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2011
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://www.appa.org/FacilitiesManager/index.cfm?ItemNumber=2578" linkWindow="_blank">http://www.appa.org/FacilitiesManager/index.cfm?ItemNumber=2578</link>
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ920053
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ920053
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 23
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Facility Inventory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Training
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teleconferencing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Costs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Construction Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Facilities Planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Distance Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Georgia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: University System of Georgia Uses FPI to Support Its Internal Evaluation Process
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kinnaman, Maggie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hunter, Ernest R.,
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Adams, Greg
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0882-7249
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Facilities Manager
              Type: main
ResultId 1