User Experience and Heritage Preservation
Saved in:
| Title: | User Experience and Heritage Preservation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Orfield, Steven J., Chapman, J. Wesley, Davis, Nathan |
| Source: | Planning for Higher Education. Apr-Jun 2011 39(3):201-208. |
| Availability: | Society for College and University Planning. 339 East Liberty Street Suite 300, Ann Arbor, MI 48104. Tel: 734-998-7832; Fax: 734-998-6532; e-mail: info@scup.org; Web site: http://www.scup.org/PHE |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2011 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Higher Education, Universities, History, Preservation, Models, Decision Making Skills, Educational Facilities, Campuses, Evaluation Criteria, Standards, Cost Effectiveness, Influence of Technology, Time Perspective, Use Studies, Adoption (Ideas), Technology Uses in Education |
| ISSN: | 0736-0983 |
| Abstract: | In considering the heritage preservation of higher education campus buildings, much of the attention gravitates toward issues of selection, cost, accuracy, and value, but the model for most preservation projects does not have a clear method of achieving the best solutions for meeting these targets. Instead, it simply relies on the design team and client team to intuitively arrive at a set of conclusions, and both may have a vested interest in either a new or preserved building. In order to gain the highest potential benefit from preservation, higher education institutions must have better protocols for determining their selection of buildings, levels of preservation, perceptual benchmarks, high-quality building performance standards, and reasoned approaches to sustainability. These authors contend that it is time that higher education institutions take a far more rigorous approach to these projects so that the results will be better-preserved buildings at a more reasonable cost and a better understanding of how new building projects can proceed with the same logic as that applied to heritage preservation. (Contains 1 figure.) |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 8 |
| Entry Date: | 2011 |
| Access URL: | https://www.scup.org/page/SCUP_PHE |
| Accession Number: | EJ943962 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ943962 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: User Experience and Heritage Preservation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Orfield%2C+Steven+J%2E%22">Orfield, Steven J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chapman%2C+J%2E+Wesley%22">Chapman, J. Wesley</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davis%2C+Nathan%22">Davis, Nathan</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Planning+for+Higher+Education%22"><i>Planning for Higher Education</i></searchLink>. Apr-Jun 2011 39(3):201-208. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Society for College and University Planning. 339 East Liberty Street Suite 300, Ann Arbor, MI 48104. Tel: 734-998-7832; Fax: 734-998-6532; e-mail: info@scup.org; Web site: http://www.scup.org/PHE – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22History%22">History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservation%22">Preservation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making+Skills%22">Decision Making Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Facilities%22">Educational Facilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Campuses%22">Campuses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influence+of+Technology%22">Influence of Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+Perspective%22">Time Perspective</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Use+Studies%22">Use Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adoption+%28Ideas%29%22">Adoption (Ideas)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0736-0983 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In considering the heritage preservation of higher education campus buildings, much of the attention gravitates toward issues of selection, cost, accuracy, and value, but the model for most preservation projects does not have a clear method of achieving the best solutions for meeting these targets. Instead, it simply relies on the design team and client team to intuitively arrive at a set of conclusions, and both may have a vested interest in either a new or preserved building. In order to gain the highest potential benefit from preservation, higher education institutions must have better protocols for determining their selection of buildings, levels of preservation, perceptual benchmarks, high-quality building performance standards, and reasoned approaches to sustainability. These authors contend that it is time that higher education institutions take a far more rigorous approach to these projects so that the results will be better-preserved buildings at a more reasonable cost and a better understanding of how new building projects can proceed with the same logic as that applied to heritage preservation. (Contains 1 figure.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 8 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://www.scup.org/page/SCUP_PHE" linkWindow="_blank">http://www.scup.org/page/SCUP_PHE</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ943962 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ943962 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 201 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: History Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservation Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Facilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Campuses Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Influence of Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Perspective Type: general – SubjectFull: Use Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Adoption (Ideas) Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: User Experience and Heritage Preservation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Orfield, Steven J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chapman, J. Wesley – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Davis, Nathan IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2011 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0736-0983 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Planning for Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
