What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates
Saved in:
| Title: | What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Gibbs, Paul, Maguire, Kate |
| Source: | Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2012 17(4):471-481. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2012 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Job Applicants, Letters (Correspondence), Advocacy, Persuasive Discourse, Change Agents, Change Strategies, Evidence, Rhetoric, Doctoral Degrees, Universities, Work Environment |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994 |
| ISSN: | 1359-6748 |
| Abstract: | This paper is about writing effective recommendations for action based on inquiries, evidence or arguments that have the purpose of effecting change. The importance of the topic for higher education is evident in the increasing accountability being asked of research from within institutions, in other words, research which provides evidenced-based conclusions but which need compelling recommendations for them to be acted upon. These recommendations might be for individuals or organisations and can range from the personal to the collective through a range of approaches and settings or workplaces: home, school, factory or business hub. Recommendations are calls to action that need to be persuasive if they are to convince others to act. We discuss how recommendations might be developed and presented calling firstly on the insights found in Aristotle's "Rhetoric" and then developing a "phronetic" method for presenting recommendations with the intent of helping them achieve the legitimate goals of their authors, supported by a review of 20 work-based doctorates. (Contains 3 notes.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 23 |
| Entry Date: | 2013 |
| Accession Number: | EJ988290 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ988290 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gibbs%2C+Paul%22">Gibbs, Paul</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maguire%2C+Kate%22">Maguire, Kate</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+in+Post-Compulsory+Education%22"><i>Research in Post-Compulsory Education</i></searchLink>. 2012 17(4):471-481. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2012 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+Applicants%22">Job Applicants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Letters+%28Correspondence%29%22">Letters (Correspondence)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advocacy%22">Advocacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Agents%22">Change Agents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Strategies%22">Change Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rhetoric%22">Rhetoric</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+Degrees%22">Doctoral Degrees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+Environment%22">Work Environment</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1359-6748 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper is about writing effective recommendations for action based on inquiries, evidence or arguments that have the purpose of effecting change. The importance of the topic for higher education is evident in the increasing accountability being asked of research from within institutions, in other words, research which provides evidenced-based conclusions but which need compelling recommendations for them to be acted upon. These recommendations might be for individuals or organisations and can range from the personal to the collective through a range of approaches and settings or workplaces: home, school, factory or business hub. Recommendations are calls to action that need to be persuasive if they are to convince others to act. We discuss how recommendations might be developed and presented calling firstly on the insights found in Aristotle's "Rhetoric" and then developing a "phronetic" method for presenting recommendations with the intent of helping them achieve the legitimate goals of their authors, supported by a review of 20 work-based doctorates. (Contains 3 notes.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 23 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2013 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ988290 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ988290 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 471 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Job Applicants Type: general – SubjectFull: Letters (Correspondence) Type: general – SubjectFull: Advocacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Agents Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Rhetoric Type: general – SubjectFull: Doctoral Degrees Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Environment Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gibbs, Paul – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Maguire, Kate IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1359-6748 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Research in Post-Compulsory Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |