What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates
Language: English
Authors: Gibbs, Paul, Maguire, Kate
Source: Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2012 17(4):471-481.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2012
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Job Applicants, Letters (Correspondence), Advocacy, Persuasive Discourse, Change Agents, Change Strategies, Evidence, Rhetoric, Doctoral Degrees, Universities, Work Environment
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994
ISSN: 1359-6748
Abstract: This paper is about writing effective recommendations for action based on inquiries, evidence or arguments that have the purpose of effecting change. The importance of the topic for higher education is evident in the increasing accountability being asked of research from within institutions, in other words, research which provides evidenced-based conclusions but which need compelling recommendations for them to be acted upon. These recommendations might be for individuals or organisations and can range from the personal to the collective through a range of approaches and settings or workplaces: home, school, factory or business hub. Recommendations are calls to action that need to be persuasive if they are to convince others to act. We discuss how recommendations might be developed and presented calling firstly on the insights found in Aristotle's "Rhetoric" and then developing a "phronetic" method for presenting recommendations with the intent of helping them achieve the legitimate goals of their authors, supported by a review of 20 work-based doctorates. (Contains 3 notes.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 23
Entry Date: 2013
Accession Number: EJ988290
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ988290
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gibbs%2C+Paul%22">Gibbs, Paul</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maguire%2C+Kate%22">Maguire, Kate</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+in+Post-Compulsory+Education%22"><i>Research in Post-Compulsory Education</i></searchLink>. 2012 17(4):471-481.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: PhysDesc
  Label: Physical Description
  Group: PhysDesc
  Data: PDF
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 11
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2012
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+Applicants%22">Job Applicants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Letters+%28Correspondence%29%22">Letters (Correspondence)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advocacy%22">Advocacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Agents%22">Change Agents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Strategies%22">Change Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rhetoric%22">Rhetoric</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+Degrees%22">Doctoral Degrees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+Environment%22">Work Environment</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1359-6748
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper is about writing effective recommendations for action based on inquiries, evidence or arguments that have the purpose of effecting change. The importance of the topic for higher education is evident in the increasing accountability being asked of research from within institutions, in other words, research which provides evidenced-based conclusions but which need compelling recommendations for them to be acted upon. These recommendations might be for individuals or organisations and can range from the personal to the collective through a range of approaches and settings or workplaces: home, school, factory or business hub. Recommendations are calls to action that need to be persuasive if they are to convince others to act. We discuss how recommendations might be developed and presented calling firstly on the insights found in Aristotle's "Rhetoric" and then developing a "phronetic" method for presenting recommendations with the intent of helping them achieve the legitimate goals of their authors, supported by a review of 20 work-based doctorates. (Contains 3 notes.)
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 23
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2013
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ988290
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ988290
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13596748.2012.738994
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 471
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Job Applicants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Letters (Correspondence)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Advocacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Change Agents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Change Strategies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rhetoric
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Doctoral Degrees
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Universities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work Environment
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: What Is in a Recommendation? A Perspective from Work-Based Doctorates
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gibbs, Paul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maguire, Kate
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1359-6748
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Research in Post-Compulsory Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1