G, S., W, A., JA, R., S, A., P, A., AZ, A., . . . N, Z. (2012). Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 33(5), 359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationG, Steinhauser, et al. "Peer Review Versus Editorial Review and Their Role in Innovative Science." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33, no. 5 (2012): 359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationG, Steinhauser, et al. "Peer Review Versus Editorial Review and Their Role in Innovative Science." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, vol. 33, no. 5, 2012, p. 359, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.