APA (7th ed.) Citation

X, S., C, W., Q, K., B, Z., P, F., J, L., . . . J, X. (2024). Channel-assisted cervical key hole technology combined with ultrasonic bone osteotome versus posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy: A clinical retrospective study. International orthopaedics, 48(2), 547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05991-8

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

X, Sun, Wang C, Kong Q, Zhang B, Feng P, Liu J, Hu Y, Ma J, and Xiang J. "Channel-assisted Cervical Key Hole Technology Combined with Ultrasonic Bone Osteotome Versus Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Clinical Retrospective Study." International Orthopaedics 48, no. 2 (2024): 547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05991-8.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

X, Sun, et al. "Channel-assisted Cervical Key Hole Technology Combined with Ultrasonic Bone Osteotome Versus Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Clinical Retrospective Study." International Orthopaedics, vol. 48, no. 2, 2024, p. 547, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05991-8.