APA (7th ed.) Citation

IA, d. K., JM, H., T, V., EA, B., MFH, M., J, S., . . . DHJ, T. (2024). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina pectoris: A retrospective study of effects on major adverse cardiovascular events and associated healthcare costs. European journal of preventive cardiology, 31(16), 1987. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae164

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

IA, de Koning, et al. "Cardiac Rehabilitation Vs. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina Pectoris: A Retrospective Study of Effects on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Associated Healthcare Costs." European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 31, no. 16 (2024): 1987. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae164.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

IA, de Koning, et al. "Cardiac Rehabilitation Vs. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina Pectoris: A Retrospective Study of Effects on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Associated Healthcare Costs." European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, vol. 31, no. 16, 2024, p. 1987, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae164.