APA (7th ed.) Citation

L, J., EH, C., P, F., J, K., K, V., M, M., . . . LO, J. (2025). Comparison of Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications. The American journal of cardiology, 235, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.019

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

L, Jakobsen, et al. "Comparison of Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications." The American Journal of Cardiology 235 (2025): 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.019.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

L, Jakobsen, et al. "Comparison of Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications." The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 235, 2025, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.019.