T, S., JL, F., S, S., BH, C., CM, F., RF, P., . . . SK, B. (2026). Reply to Editorial Comment on "Clinical Outcomes Comparing Mini Versus Standard PCNL Without Postoperative Nephrostomy Tube: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial From the EDGE Consortium. Urology, 209, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2026.01.011
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationT, Sheetz, et al. "Reply to Editorial Comment on "Clinical Outcomes Comparing Mini Versus Standard PCNL Without Postoperative Nephrostomy Tube: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial From the EDGE Consortium." Urology 209 (2026): 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2026.01.011.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationT, Sheetz, et al. "Reply to Editorial Comment on "Clinical Outcomes Comparing Mini Versus Standard PCNL Without Postoperative Nephrostomy Tube: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial From the EDGE Consortium." Urology, vol. 209, 2026, p. 40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2026.01.011.