APA (7th ed.) Citation

EP, G., B, S., A, N., D, N., W, S., A, V., . . . VY, R. (2026). Pulsed Field Ablation vs Standard Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: ADVANTAGE AF Trial Substudy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 87(14), 1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.081

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

EP, Gerstenfeld, et al. "Pulsed Field Ablation Vs Standard Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: ADVANTAGE AF Trial Substudy." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 87, no. 14 (2026): 1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.081.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

EP, Gerstenfeld, et al. "Pulsed Field Ablation Vs Standard Radiofrequency Ablation for Typical Atrial Flutter: ADVANTAGE AF Trial Substudy." Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 87, no. 14, 2026, p. 1764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.081.