APA (7th ed.) Citation

M, N., EH, C., M, H., A, E., L, J., J, E., . . . LO, J. (2026). Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent Versus the Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 107(6), 1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70549

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

M, Noori, et al. "Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent Versus the Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 107, no. 6 (2026): 1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70549.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

M, Noori, et al. "Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent Versus the Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, vol. 107, no. 6, 2026, p. 1853, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70549.