Y, L., J, K., & C, O. (2026). A detailed comparison of ΔSCF methods with the constraint-based orbital-optimized excited state method. Communications chemistry, 9(1), . https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-02003-9
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationY, Lemke, Kussmann J, and Ochsenfeld C. "A Detailed Comparison of ΔSCF Methods with the Constraint-based Orbital-optimized Excited State Method." Communications Chemistry 9, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-02003-9.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationY, Lemke, et al. "A Detailed Comparison of ΔSCF Methods with the Constraint-based Orbital-optimized Excited State Method." Communications Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-02003-9.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.