A, B., D, V., A, M., JP, A., D, M., B, B., . . . C, Z. (2026). AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 123(22), e2524747123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524747123
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationA, Brodeur, et al. "AI-assisted Teams Outperform AI-led Teams but Not Human-only Teams in Assessing Research Reproducibility in Quantitative Social Science." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 123, no. 22 (2026): e2524747123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524747123.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationA, Brodeur, et al. "AI-assisted Teams Outperform AI-led Teams but Not Human-only Teams in Assessing Research Reproducibility in Quantitative Social Science." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 123, no. 22, 2026, p. e2524747123, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524747123.