A, E., A, M., M, D., K, A., ES, B., & M, M. (2026). Optical coherence tomography versus angiography alone for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions: A meta-analysis. Coronary artery disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001656
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationA, Emara, Mansour A, Doma M, Alaswad K, Brilakis ES, and Megaly M. "Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Angiography Alone for Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Meta-analysis." Coronary Artery Disease 2026. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001656.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationA, Emara, et al. "Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Angiography Alone for Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Meta-analysis." Coronary Artery Disease, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001656.