APA (7th ed.) Citation

S, P., JE, Y., N, J., H, H., D, H., SH, K., . . . H, H. (2026). Comparison of compressed sensing and conventional 4D flow MRI for turbulent kinetic energy assessment in healthy participants and patients with aortic stenosis. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55843-9

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

S, Park, Yi JE, Jin N, Ha H, Han D, Kim SH, Lee BY, Barker AJ, and Huh H. "Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Conventional 4D Flow MRI for Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessment in Healthy Participants and Patients with Aortic Stenosis." Scientific Reports 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55843-9.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

S, Park, et al. "Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Conventional 4D Flow MRI for Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessment in Healthy Participants and Patients with Aortic Stenosis." Scientific Reports, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55843-9.