Condom negotiation in heterosexually active men and women: development and validation of a condom influence strategy questionnaire.
Saved in:
| Title: | Condom negotiation in heterosexually active men and women: development and validation of a condom influence strategy questionnaire. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Noar SM (AUTHOR), Morokoff PJ (AUTHOR), Harlow LL (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychology & Health. Dec2002, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p711-735. 25p. |
| Abstract: | The ability to negotiate condom use with a partner is a skill that sexually active men and women must have in order to avoid sexually transmitted diseases including HIV. Despite this fact, there is no psychometrically valid instrument in the literature to measure condom influence strategies. This investigation reports on the development and initial validation of the condom influence strategy questionnaire (CISQ). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses revealed and confirmed six influence strategies used by heterosexually active men and women to negotiate condom use. These CISQ subscales accounted for variance in safer sexual variables including sexual assertiveness, self-efficacy, and partner communication. Further, those who endorsed CISQ subscales were more likely to have intentions to use condoms consistently and to use condoms. Gender differences in subscales favoring women as the ones most likely to use influence strategies also emerged. Implications of these results as well as future directions for research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychology & Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 106653448 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Condom negotiation in heterosexually active men and women: development and validation of a condom influence strategy questionnaire. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Noar+SM%22">Noar SM</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morokoff+PJ%22">Morokoff PJ</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harlow+LL%22">Harlow LL</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychology+%26+Health%22">Psychology & Health</searchLink>. Dec2002, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p711-735. 25p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The ability to negotiate condom use with a partner is a skill that sexually active men and women must have in order to avoid sexually transmitted diseases including HIV. Despite this fact, there is no psychometrically valid instrument in the literature to measure condom influence strategies. This investigation reports on the development and initial validation of the condom influence strategy questionnaire (CISQ). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses revealed and confirmed six influence strategies used by heterosexually active men and women to negotiate condom use. These CISQ subscales accounted for variance in safer sexual variables including sexual assertiveness, self-efficacy, and partner communication. Further, those who endorsed CISQ subscales were more likely to have intentions to use condoms consistently and to use condoms. Gender differences in subscales favoring women as the ones most likely to use influence strategies also emerged. Implications of these results as well as future directions for research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychology & Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=106653448 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0887044021000030580 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 711 Titles: – TitleFull: Condom negotiation in heterosexually active men and women: development and validation of a condom influence strategy questionnaire. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Noar SM – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Morokoff PJ – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Harlow LL IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2002 Type: published Y: 2002 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 08870446 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychology & Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
