Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency.
Saved in:
| Title: | Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mathieson, Fiona, Jordan, Jennifer, Carter, Janet D., Stubbe, Maria |
| Source: | Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy. Mar2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p236-248. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Metaphor, Cognitive therapy, Psychotherapy, Linguists, Behavior therapists |
| Abstract: | Background: Metaphors are common in psychotherapy and have potential to enhance therapy in numerous ways. However, the empirical study of metaphors in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has tended to be put in the “too hard basket”, confined to being part of the art rather than the science of therapy. The lack of research is largely due to problems with definition, lack of a consistent, reliable approach to metaphor identification and the challenges of finding appropriate methodology to study this language-based activity. Aims: This study aimed to assess the frequency of metaphors in CBT in a large sample of therapy sessions and to evaluate the reliability and utility of the discourse dynamics approach to metaphor identification. Method: The discourse dynamics approach, recently developed by linguists, was used to identify metaphors in 48 CBT session transcripts (from 12 clients and 3 therapists) and the reliability of this approach was evaluated, using an independent rater. Results: The total frequency of metaphors was 31.5 (range 17–49) per 1000 words of therapy conversation. Therapists produced metaphors twice as often (21.2, range 7–36) as clients (10.3, range 3–24). Reliability of the Discourse Dynamics approach was adequate. Conclusions: Metaphors clearly occur in CBT sessions, with therapists using them at a higher rate than clients. While Discourse Dynamics is currently the most detailed identification approach available for investigating metaphor in CBT sessions, it is challenging to acquire skill in it and we found only adequate reliability. Ways to improve reliability and future research possibilities are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 112830257 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathieson%2C+Fiona%22">Mathieson, Fiona</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jordan%2C+Jennifer%22">Jordan, Jennifer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carter%2C+Janet+D%2E%22">Carter, Janet D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stubbe%2C+Maria%22">Stubbe, Maria</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Behavioural+%26+Cognitive+Psychotherapy%22">Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy</searchLink>. Mar2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p236-248. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metaphor%22">Metaphor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+therapy%22">Cognitive therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychotherapy%22">Psychotherapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Linguists%22">Linguists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+therapists%22">Behavior therapists</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Metaphors are common in psychotherapy and have potential to enhance therapy in numerous ways. However, the empirical study of metaphors in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has tended to be put in the “too hard basket”, confined to being part of the art rather than the science of therapy. The lack of research is largely due to problems with definition, lack of a consistent, reliable approach to metaphor identification and the challenges of finding appropriate methodology to study this language-based activity. Aims: This study aimed to assess the frequency of metaphors in CBT in a large sample of therapy sessions and to evaluate the reliability and utility of the discourse dynamics approach to metaphor identification. Method: The discourse dynamics approach, recently developed by linguists, was used to identify metaphors in 48 CBT session transcripts (from 12 clients and 3 therapists) and the reliability of this approach was evaluated, using an independent rater. Results: The total frequency of metaphors was 31.5 (range 17–49) per 1000 words of therapy conversation. Therapists produced metaphors twice as often (21.2, range 7–36) as clients (10.3, range 3–24). Reliability of the Discourse Dynamics approach was adequate. Conclusions: Metaphors clearly occur in CBT sessions, with therapists using them at a higher rate than clients. While Discourse Dynamics is currently the most detailed identification approach available for investigating metaphor in CBT sessions, it is challenging to acquire skill in it and we found only adequate reliability. Ways to improve reliability and future research possibilities are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=112830257 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1017/S1352465815000156 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 236 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Metaphor Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive therapy Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychotherapy Type: general – SubjectFull: Linguists Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior therapists Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mathieson, Fiona – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jordan, Jennifer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Carter, Janet D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stubbe, Maria IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2016 Type: published Y: 2016 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13524658 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
