View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature.
Authors:	Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia, Dyer, Karen E., Cyrus, John, Lubker, Irene Machowa
Source:	Psycho-Oncology. Jan2017, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p4-14. 11p.
Subjects:	Medical personnel, Cancer patients, Fertility preservation, Human reproductive technology, Fertility, Tumor treatment, Tumors & psychology, Attitude (Psychology), Health education, Patient-professional relations, Prognosis, Research funding, Systematic reviews
Abstract:	Objective: In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0-15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16-24 years) with cancer.Methods: Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer-reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review.Results: Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials.Conclusions: Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer-related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests. Login for full access.

Be the first to leave a comment!