Optimising feedback for early career professionals: a scoping review and new framework.
Saved in:
| Title: | Optimising feedback for early career professionals: a scoping review and new framework. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mattick, Karen (AUTHOR), Brennan, Nicola (AUTHOR), Briscoe, Simon (AUTHOR), Papoutsi, Chrysanthi (AUTHOR), Pearson, Mark (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Medical Education. Apr2019, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p355-368. 14p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Psychological feedback, Career education, Meta-analysis, Adults, Continuing education, Auditing, Goal (Psychology), Medical personnel, Entry level employees |
| Abstract: | Context: Meta‐analyses have shown that feedback can be a powerful intervention to increase learning and performance but there is significant variability in impact. New trials are adding little to the question of whether feedback interventions are effective, so the focus now is how to optimise the effect. Early career professionals (ECPs) in busy work environments are a particularly important target group. This literature review aimed to synthesise information to support the optimal design of feedback interventions for ECPs. Methods: We undertook a scoping literature review, using search terms such as 'feedback' and 'effectiveness' in MEDLINE, MEDLINE‐In‐Process, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Education Research Complete, Education Resources Information Center, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Social Sciences Citation Index and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, to identify empirical studies describing feedback interventions in busy workplaces published in English since 1990. We applied inclusion criteria to identify studies for the mapping stage and extracted key data to inform the next stage. We then selected a subset of papers for the framework development stage, which were subjected to a thematic synthesis by three authors, leading to a new feedback framework and a modified version of feedback intervention theory specifically for ECPs. Results: A total of 80 studies were included in the mapping stage, with roughly equal studies from hospital settings and school classrooms, and 17 papers were included in the framework development stage. The feedback framework comprised three main categories (audit, feedback and goal setting) and 22 subcategories. The review highlighted the limited empirical research focusing solely on feedback for ECPs, which was surprising given the particular nuances in feedback for ECPs identified through this study. Conclusions: We offer the feedback framework to optimise the design of future feedback interventions for early career professionals and encourage future feedback research to move away from generic models and tailor work to specific target audiences. Mattick et al. review the literature on feedback for early career professionals and encourage future feedback research to move away from generic models towards tailoring to specific target audiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
