Attentional suppression is delayed for threatening distractors.
Saved in:
| Title: | Attentional suppression is delayed for threatening distractors. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Burra, Nicolas (AUTHOR), Pittet, Coralie (AUTHOR), Barras, Caroline (AUTHOR), Kerzel, Dirk (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Visual Cognition. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 27 Issue 3/4, p185-198. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Spiders, Leaves |
| Abstract: | According to the threat-capture hypothesis, irrelevant-but-salient stimuli interfere more with a visual search task when they are perceived as threatening. We investigated the neural basis for behavioural interference in conditions that promote attentional suppression of distracting stimuli (i.e., easy search with predictable targets). In Experiment 1, participants discriminated the shape of a neutral target (a flower), which competed for selection with a threat-related or neutral distractor (spider or leaf, respectively). In line with prior results, we observed larger behavioural interference from spider than leaf distractors. Electrophysiological recordings revealed a posterior positivity between 200 and 300 ms, the PD, suggesting that participants actively suppressed both leaf and spider distractors. Critically, the PD was delayed with spider compared to leaf distractors. Experiment 2 was a control experiment where we confirmed that the results depended on the execution of the peripheral search task. When participants performed a localization task on the fixation cross, the decisive results from Experiment 1 were not replicated despite equal peripheral stimulation. Our results indicate that the behavioural delay incurred by threatening stimuli is accompanied by a delay of suppressive mechanisms. Conversely, we found no evidence for initial capture followed by suppression that may be predicted by hypervigilance-avoidance theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Visual Cognition is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
