Implementation of e‐mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Implementation of e‐mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Ellis, Louise A. (AUTHOR), Augustsson, Hanna (AUTHOR), Grødahl, Anne I. (AUTHOR), Pomare, Chiara (AUTHOR), Churruca, Kate (AUTHOR), Long, Janet C. (AUTHOR), Ludlow, Kristiana (AUTHOR), Zurynski, Yvonne A. (AUTHOR), Braithwaite, Jeffrey (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Community Psychology. Apr2020, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p904-920. 17p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Anxiety, Research evaluation, Research implementation, Research & development, Electronic information resource searching |
| Abstract: | The aim of this review was to scope the growth and development of implementation research of e‐mental healthcare programs for anxiety and depression, the research and evaluation tools used, and the specific implementation processes and outcomes examined. A search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) was conducted from January 2000 to January 2019. Of 33 studies identified, most (n = 28) were published in the last five years. Only 10 used an implementation framework to guide implementation or evaluation. Most studies reported on acceptability (n = 28), appropriateness (n = 23), and feasibility (n = 17). Less commonly reported implementation outcomes were fidelity (n = 10) and adoption (n = 7); with penetration (n = 4), sustainability (n = 3), and implementation cost (n = 2) being studied rarely. Of the 21 studies that used surveys to study implementation outcomes, less than half used a previously published survey (n = 9). More rigorous implementation studies, underpinned by strong theory and real‐world understanding, are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Community Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The aim of this review was to scope the growth and development of implementation research of e‐mental healthcare programs for anxiety and depression, the research and evaluation tools used, and the specific implementation processes and outcomes examined. A search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) was conducted from January 2000 to January 2019. Of 33 studies identified, most (n = 28) were published in the last five years. Only 10 used an implementation framework to guide implementation or evaluation. Most studies reported on acceptability (n = 28), appropriateness (n = 23), and feasibility (n = 17). Less commonly reported implementation outcomes were fidelity (n = 10) and adoption (n = 7); with penetration (n = 4), sustainability (n = 3), and implementation cost (n = 2) being studied rarely. Of the 21 studies that used surveys to study implementation outcomes, less than half used a previously published survey (n = 9). More rigorous implementation studies, underpinned by strong theory and real‐world understanding, are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00904392 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jcop.22309 |
