View in EDS

Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review.
Authors: Charles, Ashleigh (AUTHOR), Thompson, Dean (AUTHOR), Nixdorf, Rebecca (AUTHOR), Ryan, Grace (AUTHOR), Shamba, Donat (AUTHOR), Kalha, Jasmine (AUTHOR), Moran, Galia (AUTHOR), Hiltensperger, Ramona (AUTHOR), Mahlke, Candelaria (AUTHOR), Puschner, Bernd (AUTHOR), Repper, Julie (AUTHOR), Slade, Mike (AUTHOR), Mpango, Richard (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Psychiatry. Jun2020, Vol. 216 Issue 6, p301-307. 7p.
Subjects: Meta-analysis, Mental work, Mental health, Occupational roles, Modifications, Mental illness, Work & psychology, Affinity groups, Research, Social support, Research methodology, Systematic reviews, Medical cooperation, Evaluation research, Comparative studies
Abstract: Background: Peer support work roles are being implemented internationally, and increasingly in lower-resource settings. However, there is no framework to inform what types of modifications are needed to address local contextual and cultural aspects.Aims: To conduct a systematic review identifying a typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems.Method: We systematically reviewed the peer support literature following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews (registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) on 24 July 2018: CRD42018094832). All study designs were eligible and studies were selected according to the stated eligibility criteria and analysed with standardised critical appraisal tools. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify types of, and rationales for modifications.Results: A total of 15 300 unique studies were identified, from which 39 studies were included with only one from a low-resource setting. Six types of modifications were identified: role expectations; initial training; type of contact; role extension; workplace support for peer support workers; and recruitment. Five rationales for modifications were identified: to provide best possible peer support; to best meet service user needs; to meet organisational needs, to maximise role clarity; and to address socioeconomic issues.Conclusions: Peer support work is modified in both pre-planned and unplanned ways when implemented. Considering each identified modification as a candidate change will lead to a more systematic consideration of whether and how to modify peer support in different settings. Future evaluative research of modifiable versus non-modifiable components of peer support work is needed to understand the modifications needed for implementation among different mental health systems and cultural settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 143430895
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Charles%2C+Ashleigh%22">Charles, Ashleigh</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thompson%2C+Dean%22">Thompson, Dean</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nixdorf%2C+Rebecca%22">Nixdorf, Rebecca</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryan%2C+Grace%22">Ryan, Grace</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shamba%2C+Donat%22">Shamba, Donat</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kalha%2C+Jasmine%22">Kalha, Jasmine</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moran%2C+Galia%22">Moran, Galia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hiltensperger%2C+Ramona%22">Hiltensperger, Ramona</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mahlke%2C+Candelaria%22">Mahlke, Candelaria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Puschner%2C+Bernd%22">Puschner, Bernd</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Repper%2C+Julie%22">Repper, Julie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Slade%2C+Mike%22">Slade, Mike</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mpango%2C+Richard%22">Mpango, Richard</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Psychiatry%22">British Journal of Psychiatry</searchLink>. Jun2020, Vol. 216 Issue 6, p301-307. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+work%22">Mental work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health%22">Mental health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+roles%22">Occupational roles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Modifications%22">Modifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+illness%22">Mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+%26+psychology%22">Work & psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+cooperation%22">Medical cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+research%22">Evaluation research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Background: </bold>Peer support work roles are being implemented internationally, and increasingly in lower-resource settings. However, there is no framework to inform what types of modifications are needed to address local contextual and cultural aspects.<bold>Aims: </bold>To conduct a systematic review identifying a typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems.<bold>Method: </bold>We systematically reviewed the peer support literature following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews (registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) on 24 July 2018: CRD42018094832). All study designs were eligible and studies were selected according to the stated eligibility criteria and analysed with standardised critical appraisal tools. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify types of, and rationales for modifications.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 15 300 unique studies were identified, from which 39 studies were included with only one from a low-resource setting. Six types of modifications were identified: role expectations; initial training; type of contact; role extension; workplace support for peer support workers; and recruitment. Five rationales for modifications were identified: to provide best possible peer support; to best meet service user needs; to meet organisational needs, to maximise role clarity; and to address socioeconomic issues.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Peer support work is modified in both pre-planned and unplanned ways when implemented. Considering each identified modification as a candidate change will lead to a more systematic consideration of whether and how to modify peer support in different settings. Future evaluative research of modifiable versus non-modifiable components of peer support work is needed to understand the modifications needed for implementation among different mental health systems and cultural settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=143430895
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1192/bjp.2019.264
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 301
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental work
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Occupational roles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Modifications
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental illness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work & psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Affinity groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Charles, Ashleigh
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thompson, Dean
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nixdorf, Rebecca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ryan, Grace
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shamba, Donat
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kalha, Jasmine
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moran, Galia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hiltensperger, Ramona
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mahlke, Candelaria
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Puschner, Bernd
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Repper, Julie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Slade, Mike
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mpango, Richard
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00071250
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 216
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Psychiatry
              Type: main
ResultId 1