Does the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale predict change in delusional beliefs?
Saved in:
| Title: | Does the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale predict change in delusional beliefs? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Penzenstadler, Louise, Chatton, Anne, Lecomte, Tania, Huguelet, Philippe, Lecardeur, Laurent, Azoulay, Silke, Bartolomei, Javier, Brazo, Perrine, Murys, Elodie, Poupart, Florent, Rouvière, Serge, Parabiaghi, Alberto, Saoud, Mohamed, Favrod, Jérôme, Khazaal, Yasser |
| Source: | Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. Dec2020, Vol. 93 Issue 4, p690-704. 15p. 2 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Cognition, Delusions, Research methodology, Psychological tests, Psychoses, Secondary analysis, Predictive tests, Research methodology evaluation |
| Abstract: | Objectives: The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) is composed of two subscales, self‐reflectiveness and self‐certainty, assessing reflectiveness and openness to feedback, and mental flexibility. Delusions have previously been associated with low cognitive insight. The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in BCIS scores predict changes in delusional beliefs. Methods: The study is a secondary analysis of a previously published randomized controlled trial. All participants had a psychotic disorder diagnosis and received treatment as usual, with half of them also receiving the cognitive restructuring intervention 'Michael's game'. Participants were assessed at three different times: at baseline (T1), at 3 months (T2), and at 9 months (T3). Cognitive insight was measured with the BCIS, belief flexibility with the Maudsley assessment of delusions schedule (MADS), and psychotic symptoms with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Results: A total of 172 participants took part in the trial. After using generalized estimating equation (GEE) modelling, we observed (1) significant main effects of BCIS self‐certainty and Time and (2) significant Time × BCIS self‐certainty and Time × treatment group interaction effects on belief flexibility. Improvements in self‐certainty (i.e., decrease in scores) were associated with more changes in conviction over time, more accommodation, improved ability in ignoring or rejecting a hypothetical contradiction and increased use of verification of facts. Medication and BPRS total scores were controlled for in the GEE analyses at their baseline values. Conclusions: Overall improvement in BCIS self‐certainty scores over time predicted better treatment outcomes as assessed with MADS items. Practitioner points: Treatments for patients with psychosis should focus on improving cognitive insight as this seems to improve overall treatment outcomes and recovery.The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale can be used to measure changes during treatment and can predict treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 146974321 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Does the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale predict change in delusional beliefs? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penzenstadler%2C+Louise%22">Penzenstadler, Louise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chatton%2C+Anne%22">Chatton, Anne</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lecomte%2C+Tania%22">Lecomte, Tania</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huguelet%2C+Philippe%22">Huguelet, Philippe</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lecardeur%2C+Laurent%22">Lecardeur, Laurent</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Azoulay%2C+Silke%22">Azoulay, Silke</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bartolomei%2C+Javier%22">Bartolomei, Javier</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brazo%2C+Perrine%22">Brazo, Perrine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Murys%2C+Elodie%22">Murys, Elodie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Poupart%2C+Florent%22">Poupart, Florent</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rouvière%2C+Serge%22">Rouvière, Serge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Parabiaghi%2C+Alberto%22">Parabiaghi, Alberto</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Saoud%2C+Mohamed%22">Saoud, Mohamed</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Favrod%2C+Jérôme%22">Favrod, Jérôme</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khazaal%2C+Yasser%22">Khazaal, Yasser</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychology+%26+Psychotherapy%3A+Theory%2C+Research+%26+Practice%22">Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice</searchLink>. Dec2020, Vol. 93 Issue 4, p690-704. 15p. 2 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delusions%22">Delusions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+tests%22">Psychological tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychoses%22">Psychoses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+analysis%22">Secondary analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictive+tests%22">Predictive tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objectives: The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) is composed of two subscales, self‐reflectiveness and self‐certainty, assessing reflectiveness and openness to feedback, and mental flexibility. Delusions have previously been associated with low cognitive insight. The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in BCIS scores predict changes in delusional beliefs. Methods: The study is a secondary analysis of a previously published randomized controlled trial. All participants had a psychotic disorder diagnosis and received treatment as usual, with half of them also receiving the cognitive restructuring intervention 'Michael's game'. Participants were assessed at three different times: at baseline (T1), at 3 months (T2), and at 9 months (T3). Cognitive insight was measured with the BCIS, belief flexibility with the Maudsley assessment of delusions schedule (MADS), and psychotic symptoms with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Results: A total of 172 participants took part in the trial. After using generalized estimating equation (GEE) modelling, we observed (1) significant main effects of BCIS self‐certainty and Time and (2) significant Time × BCIS self‐certainty and Time × treatment group interaction effects on belief flexibility. Improvements in self‐certainty (i.e., decrease in scores) were associated with more changes in conviction over time, more accommodation, improved ability in ignoring or rejecting a hypothetical contradiction and increased use of verification of facts. Medication and BPRS total scores were controlled for in the GEE analyses at their baseline values. Conclusions: Overall improvement in BCIS self‐certainty scores over time predicted better treatment outcomes as assessed with MADS items. Practitioner points: Treatments for patients with psychosis should focus on improving cognitive insight as this seems to improve overall treatment outcomes and recovery.The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale can be used to measure changes during treatment and can predict treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=146974321 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/papt.12253 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 690 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cognition Type: general – SubjectFull: Delusions Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychoses Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictive tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Does the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale predict change in delusional beliefs? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Penzenstadler, Louise – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chatton, Anne – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lecomte, Tania – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huguelet, Philippe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lecardeur, Laurent – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Azoulay, Silke – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bartolomei, Javier – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brazo, Perrine – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Murys, Elodie – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Poupart, Florent – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rouvière, Serge – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Parabiaghi, Alberto – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Saoud, Mohamed – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Favrod, Jérôme – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Khazaal, Yasser IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2020 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 14760835 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 93 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |