View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

A Study Space Analysis for Multiple Interviewing of Child Witnesses.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Study Space Analysis for Multiple Interviewing of Child Witnesses.
Authors: Waterhouse, Genevieve F., Ridley, Anne M., Bull, Ray, Wilcock, Rachel
Source: Child Abuse Review. Nov/Dec2020, Vol. 29 Issue 6, p544-558. 15p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Medical research evaluation, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Interviewing, Medical protocols, Policy sciences, Legal procedure, Motivational interviewing, Adult child abuse victims, Status (Law)
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom
Abstract: This article presents a study space analysis of 44 published research studies examining the use of multiple interviews with child victims/witnesses. Study space analysis is a method of detecting gaps in the existing literature and thus determining whether ecologically valid situations that arise in practice have actually been addressed and studied. The use of this methodology is particularly useful for techniques which are being considered for changes in policy or practice, ensuring that the literature is sufficient to warrant change. Multiple or repeated interviewing has been argued by some authors to be ready for change. However, in the present study space analysis, it is concluded that despite a growing literature, there are still some key variables which require research examination prior to policy change. In particular, research is needed involving samples of children between 11 and 18 years old, participants with multiple needs and interviews regarding repeated events. Findings from the online supplementary material also identify the need for studies with longer delays between the event and the initial interview, more than two interviews of a child, phased multiple interviews and interviews conducted by professional interviewers. 'This article presents a study space analysis of 44 published research studies examining the use of multiple interviews with child victims/witnesses' Key Practitioner Messages: Some researchers suggest that interviewing a child more than once about an event can be beneficial for police investigations as it leads to additional accurate details.This study concludes that there are key variables yet to be studied under controlled conditions and thus more research is required before comprehensive policy change is recommended.Future research is required with adolescent participants, children with multiple needs and interviews about repeated events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Child Abuse Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 148160660
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Study Space Analysis for Multiple Interviewing of Child Witnesses.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Waterhouse%2C+Genevieve+F%2E%22">Waterhouse, Genevieve F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ridley%2C+Anne+M%2E%22">Ridley, Anne M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bull%2C+Ray%22">Bull, Ray</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wilcock%2C+Rachel%22">Wilcock, Rachel</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Child+Abuse+Review%22">Child Abuse Review</searchLink>. Nov/Dec2020, Vol. 29 Issue 6, p544-558. 15p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+research+evaluation%22">Medical research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+protocols%22">Medical protocols</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+sciences%22">Policy sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+procedure%22">Legal procedure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivational+interviewing%22">Motivational interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adult+child+abuse+victims%22">Adult child abuse victims</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Status+%28Law%29%22">Status (Law)</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article presents a study space analysis of 44 published research studies examining the use of multiple interviews with child victims/witnesses. Study space analysis is a method of detecting gaps in the existing literature and thus determining whether ecologically valid situations that arise in practice have actually been addressed and studied. The use of this methodology is particularly useful for techniques which are being considered for changes in policy or practice, ensuring that the literature is sufficient to warrant change. Multiple or repeated interviewing has been argued by some authors to be ready for change. However, in the present study space analysis, it is concluded that despite a growing literature, there are still some key variables which require research examination prior to policy change. In particular, research is needed involving samples of children between 11 and 18 years old, participants with multiple needs and interviews regarding repeated events. Findings from the online supplementary material also identify the need for studies with longer delays between the event and the initial interview, more than two interviews of a child, phased multiple interviews and interviews conducted by professional interviewers. 'This article presents a study space analysis of 44 published research studies examining the use of multiple interviews with child victims/witnesses' Key Practitioner Messages: Some researchers suggest that interviewing a child more than once about an event can be beneficial for police investigations as it leads to additional accurate details.This study concludes that there are key variables yet to be studied under controlled conditions and thus more research is required before comprehensive policy change is recommended.Future research is required with adolescent participants, children with multiple needs and interviews about repeated events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Child Abuse Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=148160660
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/car.2604
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 544
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Medical research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical protocols
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Legal procedure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivational interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adult child abuse victims
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Status (Law)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Study Space Analysis for Multiple Interviewing of Child Witnesses.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Waterhouse, Genevieve F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ridley, Anne M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bull, Ray
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wilcock, Rachel
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov/Dec2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09529136
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Child Abuse Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1