Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based Meditation Practice: Psychometric Evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire.
Saved in:
| Title: | Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based Meditation Practice: Psychometric Evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hassed, Craig (AUTHOR), Flighty, Andrew (AUTHOR), Chambers, Richard (AUTHOR), Hosemans, Dominic (AUTHOR), Bailey, Neil (AUTHOR), Connaughton, Sherelle (AUTHOR), Lee, Stuart (AUTHOR), Kazantzis, Nikolaos (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Cognitive Therapy & Research. 2021, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p190-204. 15p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Mindfulness, Psychometrics, Meditation, Statistical reliability, Discriminant analysis |
| Abstract: | Background: Mindfulness-based meditation practice (MBP) can be assessed in terms of time spent (quantity) or skill acquisition (quality), but these components have rarely been delineated in adherence measures. Individuals may also engage in MBP through everyday life (informal practice) and dedicate specific time for MBP (formal practice). Method: The Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire, a scale designed to assess quantity and quality of formal and informal MBP was evaluated. Study 1 used a cross-sectional design to examine internal reliability and construct validity (N = 282). Study 2 examined test–retest reliability and sensitivity (N = 55) during a 4-week mindfulness intervention. Results: A nested-factor model showed adequate fit: MAQ items loaded on both the general factor (Practice) and specific factors (Formal and Informal). Discriminant validity analyses revealed the MAQ captured MBP adherence distinct from trait mindfulness. Quality of both formal and informal mindfulness practice was more strongly associated with higher levels of trait mindfulness than quantity. Changes in MAQ Quantity scores were observed over time. Conclusions: The MAQ is reliable and has a meaningful scale structure, may usefully distinguish both quality versus quantity and formal versus informal MBP, and is sensitive to variations in MBP and does not solely measure trait mindfulness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Cognitive Therapy & Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 148320606 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based Meditation Practice: Psychometric Evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hassed%2C+Craig%22">Hassed, Craig</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Flighty%2C+Andrew%22">Flighty, Andrew</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chambers%2C+Richard%22">Chambers, Richard</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hosemans%2C+Dominic%22">Hosemans, Dominic</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bailey%2C+Neil%22">Bailey, Neil</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Connaughton%2C+Sherelle%22">Connaughton, Sherelle</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+Stuart%22">Lee, Stuart</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kazantzis%2C+Nikolaos%22">Kazantzis, Nikolaos</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Cognitive+Therapy+%26+Research%22">Cognitive Therapy & Research</searchLink>. 2021, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p190-204. 15p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mindfulness%22">Mindfulness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meditation%22">Meditation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discriminant+analysis%22">Discriminant analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Mindfulness-based meditation practice (MBP) can be assessed in terms of time spent (quantity) or skill acquisition (quality), but these components have rarely been delineated in adherence measures. Individuals may also engage in MBP through everyday life (informal practice) and dedicate specific time for MBP (formal practice). Method: The Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire, a scale designed to assess quantity and quality of formal and informal MBP was evaluated. Study 1 used a cross-sectional design to examine internal reliability and construct validity (N = 282). Study 2 examined test–retest reliability and sensitivity (N = 55) during a 4-week mindfulness intervention. Results: A nested-factor model showed adequate fit: MAQ items loaded on both the general factor (Practice) and specific factors (Formal and Informal). Discriminant validity analyses revealed the MAQ captured MBP adherence distinct from trait mindfulness. Quality of both formal and informal mindfulness practice was more strongly associated with higher levels of trait mindfulness than quantity. Changes in MAQ Quantity scores were observed over time. Conclusions: The MAQ is reliable and has a meaningful scale structure, may usefully distinguish both quality versus quantity and formal versus informal MBP, and is sensitive to variations in MBP and does not solely measure trait mindfulness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Cognitive Therapy & Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=148320606 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10608-020-10150-z Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 190 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Mindfulness Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Meditation Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Discriminant analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based Meditation Practice: Psychometric Evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hassed, Craig – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Flighty, Andrew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chambers, Richard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hosemans, Dominic – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bailey, Neil – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Connaughton, Sherelle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee, Stuart – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kazantzis, Nikolaos IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: 2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01475916 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 45 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Cognitive Therapy & Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |