Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.
Authors: Suen, Paulo J. C. (AUTHOR), Doll, Sarah (AUTHOR), Batistuzzo, Marcelo C. (AUTHOR), Busatto, Geraldo (AUTHOR), Razza, Lais B. (AUTHOR), Padberg, Frank (AUTHOR), Mezger, Eva (AUTHOR), Bulubas, Lucia (AUTHOR), Keeser, Daniel (AUTHOR), Deng, Zhi-De (AUTHOR), Brunoni, Andre R. (AUTHOR)
Source: European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience. Feb2021, Vol. 271 Issue 1, p101-110. 10p. 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subjects: Treatment effectiveness, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Brain stimulation, Clinical trials, Electric fields
Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention investigated for the treatment of depression. Clinical results have been heterogeneous, partly due to the variability of electric field (EF) strength in the brain owing to interindividual differences in head anatomy. Therefore, we investigated whether EF strength was correlated with behavioral changes in 16 depressed patients using simulated electric fields in real patient data from a controlled clinical trial. We hypothesized that EF strength in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), brain regions implicated in depression pathophysiology, would be associated with changes in depression, mood and anxiety scores. SimNIBS were used to simulate individual electric fields based on the MRI structural T1-weighted brain scans of depressed subjects. Linear regression models showed, at the end of the acute treatment phase, that simulated EF strength was inversely associated with negative affect in the bilateral ACC (left: β = − 160.463, CI [− 291.541, − 29.385], p = 0.021; right: β = − 189.194, CI [− 289.479, − 88.910], p = 0.001) and DLPFC (left: β = − 93.210, CI [− 154.960, − 31.461], p = 0.006; right: β = − 82.564, CI [− 142.867, − 22.262], p = 0.011) and with depression scores in the left ACC (β = − 156.91, CI [− 298.51, − 15.30], p = 0.033). No association between positive affect or anxiety scores, and simulated EF strength in the investigated brain regions was found. To conclude, our findings show preliminary evidence that EF strength simulations might be associated with further behavioral changes in depressed patients, unveiling a potential mechanism of action for tDCS. Further studies should investigate whether individualization of EF strength in key brain regions impact clinical response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 148539667
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Suen%2C+Paulo+J%2E+C%2E%22">Suen, Paulo J. C.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Doll%2C+Sarah%22">Doll, Sarah</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Batistuzzo%2C+Marcelo+C%2E%22">Batistuzzo, Marcelo C.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Busatto%2C+Geraldo%22">Busatto, Geraldo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Razza%2C+Lais+B%2E%22">Razza, Lais B.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Padberg%2C+Frank%22">Padberg, Frank</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mezger%2C+Eva%22">Mezger, Eva</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bulubas%2C+Lucia%22">Bulubas, Lucia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Keeser%2C+Daniel%22">Keeser, Daniel</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deng%2C+Zhi-De%22">Deng, Zhi-De</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brunoni%2C+Andre+R%2E%22">Brunoni, Andre R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Archives+of+Psychiatry+%26+Clinical+Neuroscience%22">European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience</searchLink>. Feb2021, Vol. 271 Issue 1, p101-110. 10p. 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transcranial+direct+current+stimulation%22">Transcranial direct current stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+stimulation%22">Brain stimulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+trials%22">Clinical trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electric+fields%22">Electric fields</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention investigated for the treatment of depression. Clinical results have been heterogeneous, partly due to the variability of electric field (EF) strength in the brain owing to interindividual differences in head anatomy. Therefore, we investigated whether EF strength was correlated with behavioral changes in 16 depressed patients using simulated electric fields in real patient data from a controlled clinical trial. We hypothesized that EF strength in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), brain regions implicated in depression pathophysiology, would be associated with changes in depression, mood and anxiety scores. SimNIBS were used to simulate individual electric fields based on the MRI structural T1-weighted brain scans of depressed subjects. Linear regression models showed, at the end of the acute treatment phase, that simulated EF strength was inversely associated with negative affect in the bilateral ACC (left: β = − 160.463, CI [− 291.541, − 29.385], p = 0.021; right: β = − 189.194, CI [− 289.479, − 88.910], p = 0.001) and DLPFC (left: β = − 93.210, CI [− 154.960, − 31.461], p = 0.006; right: β = − 82.564, CI [− 142.867, − 22.262], p = 0.011) and with depression scores in the left ACC (β = − 156.91, CI [− 298.51, − 15.30], p = 0.033). No association between positive affect or anxiety scores, and simulated EF strength in the investigated brain regions was found. To conclude, our findings show preliminary evidence that EF strength simulations might be associated with further behavioral changes in depressed patients, unveiling a potential mechanism of action for tDCS. Further studies should investigate whether individualization of EF strength in key brain regions impact clinical response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=148539667
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00406-020-01127-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 101
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transcranial direct current stimulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Brain stimulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electric fields
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Suen, Paulo J. C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Doll, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Batistuzzo, Marcelo C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Busatto, Geraldo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Razza, Lais B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Padberg, Frank
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mezger, Eva
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bulubas, Lucia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Keeser, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Deng, Zhi-De
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brunoni, Andre R.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09401334
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 271
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience
              Type: main
ResultId 1