View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions.
Authors: Wolfenden, Luke (AUTHOR), Movsisyan, Ani (AUTHOR), McCrabb, Sam (AUTHOR), Stratil, Jan M (AUTHOR), Yoong, Sze Lin (AUTHOR)
Source: American Journal of Public Health. Mar2021, Vol. 111 Issue 3, p465-470. 6p.
Subjects: Decision making, Health policy, Public health, Systematic reviews, Government policy, Stakeholder analysis
Abstract: For systematic reviews to have an impact on public health, they must report outcomes that are important for decision-making. Systematic reviews of public health interventions, however, have a range of potential end users, and identifying and prioritizing the most important and relevant outcomes represents a considerable challenge. In this commentary, we describe potentially useful approaches that systematic review teams can use to identify review outcomes to best inform public health decision-making. Specifically, we discuss the importance of stakeholder engagement, the use of logic models, consideration of core outcome sets, reviews of the literature on end users' needs and preferences, and the use of decision-making frameworks in the selection and prioritization of outcomes included in reviews. The selection of review outcomes is a critical step in the production of public health reviews that are relevant to those who use them. Utilizing the suggested strategies may help the review teams better achieve this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 148624516
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wolfenden%2C+Luke%22">Wolfenden, Luke</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Movsisyan%2C+Ani%22">Movsisyan, Ani</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCrabb%2C+Sam%22">McCrabb, Sam</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stratil%2C+Jan+M%22">Stratil, Jan M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yoong%2C+Sze+Lin%22">Yoong, Sze Lin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Public+Health%22">American Journal of Public Health</searchLink>. Mar2021, Vol. 111 Issue 3, p465-470. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+policy%22">Health policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+policy%22">Government policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: For systematic reviews to have an impact on public health, they must report outcomes that are important for decision-making. Systematic reviews of public health interventions, however, have a range of potential end users, and identifying and prioritizing the most important and relevant outcomes represents a considerable challenge. In this commentary, we describe potentially useful approaches that systematic review teams can use to identify review outcomes to best inform public health decision-making. Specifically, we discuss the importance of stakeholder engagement, the use of logic models, consideration of core outcome sets, reviews of the literature on end users' needs and preferences, and the use of decision-making frameworks in the selection and prioritization of outcomes included in reviews. The selection of review outcomes is a critical step in the production of public health reviews that are relevant to those who use them. Utilizing the suggested strategies may help the review teams better achieve this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=148624516
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306061
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 465
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Government policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wolfenden, Luke
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Movsisyan, Ani
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McCrabb, Sam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stratil, Jan M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yoong, Sze Lin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00900036
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 111
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Public Health
              Type: main
ResultId 1