View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Understanding non‐installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Understanding non‐installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.
Authors: Romosz, Ann M. (AUTHOR), Scherer, Michael (AUTHOR), Voas, Robert B. (AUTHOR), Romano, Eduardo (AUTHOR), Nochajski, Thomas H. (AUTHOR), Taylor, Eileen P. (AUTHOR), Brogdale, Meg R. (AUTHOR), Manning, Amy R. (AUTHOR)
Source: Drug & Alcohol Review. Sep2021, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p1083-1091. 9p. 2 Diagrams, 1 Chart.
Subjects: Drunk driving, Alcohol drinking, Grounded theory, Thematic analysis, Semi-structured interviews
Geographic Terms: New York (State)
Abstract: Introduction: Literature notes the efficacious use of alcohol ignition interlock devices (IID) in reducing rates of drinking and driving while installed on the vehicle. Some drivers who are convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI) elect to have their license suspended/revoked instead of installing the device. These individuals represent a high‐risk subsample of drivers, yet limited literature has addressed this concern. The current study seeks to fill this gap using qualitative interviews addressing: (i) why do non‐installers make the choice to not install a mandated IID; and (ii) how are non‐installers managing without the IID? Methods: The study utilises the Managing Heavy Drinkers study of drivers in Erie County, New York, USA. Participants were purposively sampled from a group of non‐installers (n = 6; four females, two males) who completed semi‐structured interviews. Constructed grounded theory was used to develop a theoretical understanding of participant's experiences. Results: To understand why participants elect not to install the IID, thematic analysis revealed: alleviating constraints, predominantly the financial burdens associated with an IID, and institutional mistrust. Additionally, data revealed that participants are managing without the IID by mitigating apprehension. This included driving cautiously to avoid detection and utilising alternative transportation. Discussion and Conclusions: This study furthers understanding of why drivers convicted of a DWI elect not to install an IID. Future research should seek to identify barriers to IID installation. This work provides evidence for establishing institutional protocols that ensure drivers convicted of a DWI receive consistent and correct information about the IID process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 152208109
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Understanding non‐installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Romosz%2C+Ann+M%2E%22">Romosz, Ann M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scherer%2C+Michael%22">Scherer, Michael</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Voas%2C+Robert+B%2E%22">Voas, Robert B.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Romano%2C+Eduardo%22">Romano, Eduardo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nochajski%2C+Thomas+H%2E%22">Nochajski, Thomas H.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Taylor%2C+Eileen+P%2E%22">Taylor, Eileen P.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brogdale%2C+Meg+R%2E%22">Brogdale, Meg R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manning%2C+Amy+R%2E%22">Manning, Amy R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Drug+%26+Alcohol+Review%22">Drug & Alcohol Review</searchLink>. Sep2021, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p1083-1091. 9p. 2 Diagrams, 1 Chart.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drunk+driving%22">Drunk driving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alcohol+drinking%22">Alcohol drinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grounded+theory%22">Grounded theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Semi-structured+interviews%22">Semi-structured interviews</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+York+%28State%29%22">New York (State)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: Literature notes the efficacious use of alcohol ignition interlock devices (IID) in reducing rates of drinking and driving while installed on the vehicle. Some drivers who are convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI) elect to have their license suspended/revoked instead of installing the device. These individuals represent a high‐risk subsample of drivers, yet limited literature has addressed this concern. The current study seeks to fill this gap using qualitative interviews addressing: (i) why do non‐installers make the choice to not install a mandated IID; and (ii) how are non‐installers managing without the IID? Methods: The study utilises the Managing Heavy Drinkers study of drivers in Erie County, New York, USA. Participants were purposively sampled from a group of non‐installers (n = 6; four females, two males) who completed semi‐structured interviews. Constructed grounded theory was used to develop a theoretical understanding of participant's experiences. Results: To understand why participants elect not to install the IID, thematic analysis revealed: alleviating constraints, predominantly the financial burdens associated with an IID, and institutional mistrust. Additionally, data revealed that participants are managing without the IID by mitigating apprehension. This included driving cautiously to avoid detection and utilising alternative transportation. Discussion and Conclusions: This study furthers understanding of why drivers convicted of a DWI elect not to install an IID. Future research should seek to identify barriers to IID installation. This work provides evidence for establishing institutional protocols that ensure drivers convicted of a DWI receive consistent and correct information about the IID process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=152208109
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/dar.13275
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1083
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Drunk driving
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Alcohol drinking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grounded theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Semi-structured interviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: New York (State)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Understanding non‐installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Romosz, Ann M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scherer, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Voas, Robert B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Romano, Eduardo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nochajski, Thomas H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Taylor, Eileen P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brogdale, Meg R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Manning, Amy R.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09595236
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Drug & Alcohol Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1