Virtue science and productive theoretical neutrality: Review of Wright, J. C., Warren, M., & Snow, N. Understanding virtue.
Saved in:
| Title: | Virtue science and productive theoretical neutrality: Review of Wright, J. C., Warren, M., & Snow, N. Understanding virtue. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cokelet, Bradford |
| Source: | Journal of Moral Education. Mar2022, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p104-110. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Moral development, Virtues, Wisdom, Interdisciplinary research, Hypothesis |
| Abstract: | In this wise and creative book, Wright, Warren, and Snow propose a path-breaking interdisciplinary research program that promises to ground a mature science of moral virtue. Their theoretical framework and ideas for measurement are designed to guide psychologists as they study the individual traits that people have, the ways that traits interact or conflict, and the ways they change over time. While lauding the authors' impressive achievements, I criticize the contentious Aristotelian assumptions they build into their program. I argue that the science of virtue will be better served if researchers restrict themselves to more neutral assumptions and convert philosophically contentious views into competing empirical hypotheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 155732927 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Virtue science and productive theoretical neutrality: Review of Wright, J. C., Warren, M., & Snow, N. Understanding virtue. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cokelet%2C+Bradford%22">Cokelet, Bradford</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Moral+Education%22">Journal of Moral Education</searchLink>. Mar2022, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p104-110. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+development%22">Moral development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Virtues%22">Virtues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wisdom%22">Wisdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+research%22">Interdisciplinary research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hypothesis%22">Hypothesis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In this wise and creative book, Wright, Warren, and Snow propose a path-breaking interdisciplinary research program that promises to ground a mature science of moral virtue. Their theoretical framework and ideas for measurement are designed to guide psychologists as they study the individual traits that people have, the ways that traits interact or conflict, and the ways they change over time. While lauding the authors' impressive achievements, I criticize the contentious Aristotelian assumptions they build into their program. I argue that the science of virtue will be better served if researchers restrict themselves to more neutral assumptions and convert philosophically contentious views into competing empirical hypotheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=155732927 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03057240.2022.2026090 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 104 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Moral development Type: general – SubjectFull: Virtues Type: general – SubjectFull: Wisdom Type: general – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary research Type: general – SubjectFull: Hypothesis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Virtue science and productive theoretical neutrality: Review of Wright, J. C., Warren, M., & Snow, N. Understanding virtue. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cokelet, Bradford IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03057240 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Moral Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
