View in EDS PDF Full Text

Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease.
Authors: Wenger, David, Nowlin, Ross, Johnson, Austin L., Anderson, Michael, Weaver, Michael, Hartwell, Micah, Vassar, Matt
Source: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Sep2022, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p1004-1012. 9p.
Subjects: Meta-analysis, Authors, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Systematic reviews, Conflict of interests, Endowment of research, Interprofessional relations, Ménière's disease, Descriptive statistics, MEDLINE, Research bias
Abstract: Objectives: To quantify the presence of conflicts of interest (COI) in SRs and MAs of Ménières disease treatment and identify any related secondary characteristics of these articles. Methods: A search was conducted on May 28, 2020 to search MEDLINE and Embase databases for SRs or MAs pertaining to Ménières disease published between September 1, 2016 and June 2, 2020. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment criteria. Results: A total of 13 systematic reviews conducted by 49 authors met the inclusion criteria. Of the 49 authors, 7 (14.3%) were found to have some form of COI. Of these 7 authors, 1 (14.3%) completely disclosed all COI within the SR, 1 (14.3%) disclosed one or more COI but were found to have an additional undisclosed COI, and 5 (71.4%) were found to have only undisclosed COI. One of 2 industry funded SRs (50%) had a high risk of bias, and 1 (50%) of the non-industry sponsored SRs were found to have a high risk of bias. Conclusions: Overall authors of SRs pertaining to Ménières disease appear to be properly disclosing COI at higher rates than other fields of medicine; however, further room for improvement has been noted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 158842430
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wenger%2C+David%22">Wenger, David</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nowlin%2C+Ross%22">Nowlin, Ross</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Austin+L%2E%22">Johnson, Austin L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anderson%2C+Michael%22">Anderson, Michael</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weaver%2C+Michael%22">Weaver, Michael</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hartwell%2C+Micah%22">Hartwell, Micah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vassar%2C+Matt%22">Vassar, Matt</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Annals+of+Otology%2C+Rhinology+%26+Laryngology%22">Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology</searchLink>. Sep2022, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p1004-1012. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conflict+of+interests%22">Conflict of interests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Endowment+of+research%22">Endowment of research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ménière's+disease%22">Ménière's disease</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+bias%22">Research bias</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: To quantify the presence of conflicts of interest (COI) in SRs and MAs of Ménières disease treatment and identify any related secondary characteristics of these articles. Methods: A search was conducted on May 28, 2020 to search MEDLINE and Embase databases for SRs or MAs pertaining to Ménières disease published between September 1, 2016 and June 2, 2020. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment criteria. Results: A total of 13 systematic reviews conducted by 49 authors met the inclusion criteria. Of the 49 authors, 7 (14.3%) were found to have some form of COI. Of these 7 authors, 1 (14.3%) completely disclosed all COI within the SR, 1 (14.3%) disclosed one or more COI but were found to have an additional undisclosed COI, and 5 (71.4%) were found to have only undisclosed COI. One of 2 industry funded SRs (50%) had a high risk of bias, and 1 (50%) of the non-industry sponsored SRs were found to have a high risk of bias. Conclusions: Overall authors of SRs pertaining to Ménières disease appear to be properly disclosing COI at higher rates than other fields of medicine; however, further room for improvement has been noted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=158842430
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/00034894211051822
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1004
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Authors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conflict of interests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Endowment of research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ménière's disease
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research bias
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wenger, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nowlin, Ross
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johnson, Austin L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anderson, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weaver, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hartwell, Micah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vassar, Matt
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00034894
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 131
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
              Type: main
ResultId 1