An experimental COVID‐19 messaging study in a representative sample of the Scottish population: Increasing physical distancing intentions through self‐efficacy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An experimental COVID‐19 messaging study in a representative sample of the Scottish population: Increasing physical distancing intentions through self‐efficacy.
Authors: den Daas, Chantal (AUTHOR), Johnston, Marie (AUTHOR), Hubbard, Gill (AUTHOR), Dixon, Diane (AUTHOR), Cristea, Mioara (AUTHOR), Davis, Alive (AUTHOR), Dobbie, Fiona (AUTHOR), Fitzgerald, Niamh (AUTHOR), Fleming, Leanne (AUTHOR), Fraquharson, Barbara (AUTHOR), Gorely, Trish (AUTHOR), Gray, Cindy (AUTHOR), Grindle, Mark (AUTHOR), HarkessMurphy, Eileen (AUTHOR), Hunt, Kate (AUTHOR), Ion, Robin (AUTHOR), Kidd, Lisa (AUTHOR), Lansdown, Terry (AUTHOR), Macaden, Leah (AUTHOR), Maltinsky, Wendy (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Health Psychology. May2023, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p439-450. 12p. 1 Diagram.
Subjects: Social distancing, Scots, COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19, Intention
Geographic Terms: Scotland
Abstract: Objectives: Self‐efficacy is important for adherence to transmission‐reducing behaviours (e.g., physical distancing) as also shown in the CHARIS project. We aimed to show that a theory‐based short message can increase physical distancing self‐efficacy and intentions to keep physical distance. Design: Structured telephone surveys with a randomly selected nationally representative sample of adults in Scotland (N = 497). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions: message condition (short message to increase self‐efficacy via vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and emotional arousal) or control condition (no message). Followed by measures for self‐efficacy and intention for physical distancing on 4‐point scales. Adherence to physical distancing was assessed on a 5‐point frequency scale (never – always). Results: Using mediation analyses with bootstrapping procedures, we first confirmed that self‐efficacy was associated indirectly with adherence, via higher intentions in a partial mediation (unstandardized indirect effect.21, 95% CI.18–.25). The message increased self‐efficacy; participants receiving the message reported higher self‐efficacy (M = 4.23, SD =.80) compared to participants in the control condition (M = 4.08, SD =.77; standardized regression coefficient =.19, p <.05) and self‐efficacy affected intention (.48, p <.001). There was a small significant indirect effect of the message on intention via self‐efficacy (unstandardized indirect effect.07, CI.01–.14). Conclusions: Increasing self‐efficacy for physical distancing with a short message can successfully increase intention to physical distance via increased self‐efficacy. As both self‐efficacy and intentions are important predictors of adherence to transmission‐reducing behaviours short messages have potential to limit the spread of COVID‐19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Health Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first