Evidence mapping of clinical practice guidelines recommendations and quality for depression in children and adolescents.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evidence mapping of clinical practice guidelines recommendations and quality for depression in children and adolescents. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Yan, Meili, Chen, Lingmin, Yang, Min, Zhang, Li, Niu, Mingming, Wu, Fangfang, Chen, Yamin, Song, Ziwei, Zhang, Yonggang, Li, Jiang, Tian, Jinhui |
| Source: | European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. Nov2023, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p2091-2108. 18p. |
| Subjects: | Online information services, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Confidence intervals, Depression in children, Systematic reviews, Evidence gaps, Medical protocols, Depression in adolescence, Quality assurance, Eligibility (Social aspects), Research funding, MEDLINE, Data analysis software |
| Abstract: | This study systematically reviewed the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for depression in children and adolescents and assessed the quality and recommendation consistency of those CPGs. Evidence mapping was presented to illustrate the research trends and identify gaps to guide future research. Literature on CPGs for depression was systematically collected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, guideline databases, and psychiatric association/ society websites. The basic information, recommendations, methodological quality, and reporting quality of CPGs were extracted, and the supporting evidence strength for the included CPGs was analyzed in Excel. Four appraisers independently assessed the eligible CPGs using AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. All recommendations from the CPGs were summarized and analyzed, and the evidence mapping bubble charts were plotted in Excel. After excluding 15,184 records, 12 depression CPGs were eventually proved eligible, six of which were of high quality and six medium quality. A total of 39 major recommendations were summarized, 35 of which were supported by high-quality CPGs. Although direct comparisons are challenging due to differences in grading schemes and research quality, most CPGs share many pivotal recommendations that can help guide clinical practice. However, the evidence for some clinical problems is still lacking. Thus, more research is necessary on the screening and treatment of children and adolescents to put forward more evidence-based and high-quality recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
