View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

An integrated intervention programme for couples facing colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An integrated intervention programme for couples facing colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
Authors: Wang, Zhiming (AUTHOR), Chen, Meizhen (AUTHOR), Cao, Qian (AUTHOR), Gong, Jiali (AUTHOR), Zhao, Jie (AUTHOR), Lin, Chunyan (AUTHOR), Luo, Huamin (AUTHOR), Wu, Xinyu (AUTHOR), Chen, Ying (AUTHOR), Li, Qiuping (AUTHOR)
Source: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Jan2024, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
Subjects: Cancer patient psychology, Evaluation of human services programs, Analysis of variance, Social support, Marital satisfaction, Mental health, Quantitative research, Colorectal cancer, Spouses, Randomized controlled trials, Conceptual structures, Comparative studies, Self-efficacy, Qualitative research, Interprofessional relations, Communication, Psychology of caregivers, Descriptive statistics, Integrated health care delivery, Statistical sampling, Emotions, Psychological adaptation
Abstract: Background: Under the guidance of a preliminary Live with Love Conceptual Framework, a Caring for Couples Coping with Colorectal Cancer (4Cs: CRC) programme was designed specifically for colorectal cancer couples. The objectives of this study included examining the efficacy of the programme for couples adapting to colorectal cancer and comparing the effects of different intervention delivery modes (online, face‐to‐face and blended) on couple outcomes. Methods: A four‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted among Chinese colorectal cancer couples. Couples were randomly assigned to an online intervention, a face‐to‐face intervention, a blended intervention or a control group. Self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication and dyadic outcomes (physical and mental health, negative and positive emotions and marital satisfaction) were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks later. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA were employed to assess between‐group differences and within‐group effects in the four groups, respectively. Results: A total of 179 couples completed the 6‐week study and post‐study assessments. The intervention showed generally medium‐to‐large effects across multiple measured outcomes, including self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication, mental health, negative emotions and positive emotions for both patients and spouse caregivers. Additionally, interventions delivered through different modes produced equally significant effects on couple outcomes. Conclusions: The integrated intervention programme is effective in improving cancer adaptation in colorectal cancer couples. Long‐term follow‐up and a mix of quantitative and qualitative assessments are crucial for further evaluation of the programme. Trial registration: Retroactive registration is under review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 175704179
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An integrated intervention programme for couples facing colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Zhiming%22">Wang, Zhiming</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Meizhen%22">Chen, Meizhen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cao%2C+Qian%22">Cao, Qian</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gong%2C+Jiali%22">Gong, Jiali</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhao%2C+Jie%22">Zhao, Jie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lin%2C+Chunyan%22">Lin, Chunyan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luo%2C+Huamin%22">Luo, Huamin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wu%2C+Xinyu%22">Wu, Xinyu</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Ying%22">Chen, Ying</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Qiuping%22">Li, Qiuping</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Clinical+Psychology+%26+Psychotherapy%22">Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy</searchLink>. Jan2024, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+patient+psychology%22">Cancer patient psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+variance%22">Analysis of variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marital+satisfaction%22">Marital satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health%22">Mental health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quantitative+research%22">Quantitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colorectal+cancer%22">Colorectal cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spouses%22">Spouses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+caregivers%22">Psychology of caregivers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrated+health+care+delivery%22">Integrated health care delivery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotions%22">Emotions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+adaptation%22">Psychological adaptation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Under the guidance of a preliminary Live with Love Conceptual Framework, a Caring for Couples Coping with Colorectal Cancer (4Cs: CRC) programme was designed specifically for colorectal cancer couples. The objectives of this study included examining the efficacy of the programme for couples adapting to colorectal cancer and comparing the effects of different intervention delivery modes (online, face‐to‐face and blended) on couple outcomes. Methods: A four‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted among Chinese colorectal cancer couples. Couples were randomly assigned to an online intervention, a face‐to‐face intervention, a blended intervention or a control group. Self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication and dyadic outcomes (physical and mental health, negative and positive emotions and marital satisfaction) were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks later. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA were employed to assess between‐group differences and within‐group effects in the four groups, respectively. Results: A total of 179 couples completed the 6‐week study and post‐study assessments. The intervention showed generally medium‐to‐large effects across multiple measured outcomes, including self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication, mental health, negative emotions and positive emotions for both patients and spouse caregivers. Additionally, interventions delivered through different modes produced equally significant effects on couple outcomes. Conclusions: The integrated intervention programme is effective in improving cancer adaptation in colorectal cancer couples. Long‐term follow‐up and a mix of quantitative and qualitative assessments are crucial for further evaluation of the programme. Trial registration: Retroactive registration is under review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=175704179
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/cpp.2919
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cancer patient psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Analysis of variance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Marital satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quantitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Colorectal cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spouses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology of caregivers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Integrated health care delivery
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological adaptation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An integrated intervention programme for couples facing colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Zhiming
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Meizhen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cao, Qian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gong, Jiali
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhao, Jie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lin, Chunyan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Luo, Huamin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wu, Xinyu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Ying
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Qiuping
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10633995
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
              Type: main
ResultId 1