Gender Representation on Editorial Boards of JAMA Network Journals.
Saved in:
| Title: | Gender Representation on Editorial Boards of JAMA Network Journals. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Schaechter, Judith D., Jacobs, Jeremy W., Booth, Garrett S., Dupont, William D., Silver, Julie K. |
| Source: | Journal of Women's Health (15409996). Apr2024, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p446-452. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Health services administration, Cross-sectional method, Diversity & inclusion policies, Sex distribution, Benchmarking (Management), Sex discrimination, Descriptive statistics, Publishing, Data analysis software, Confidence intervals, Women's employment |
| Abstract: | Objective: Underrepresentation of women on editorial boards of biomedical journals has occurred for decades. The JAMA Network Journals have substantial and broad impact on advances in the biomedical sciences. We sought to determine the current status of gender representation on editorial boards of the 12 JAMA Network Journals. Methods: The gender of each editorial board member of the 12 JAMA Network Journals was classified based on review of online sources. The percentage of women on each board (i.e., number of women relative to total members) was calculated and compared to gender equity and parity benchmarks. The gender equity benchmark for each journal was defined as the percentage of women physicians in the medical specialty reflecting the journal's content based on Association of American Medical Colleges data. The gender parity benchmark for all journals was defined as 50% women. Results: There was considerable variation in the representation of women on the editorial boards of the JAMA Network Journals relative to gender equity and parity benchmarks. Women were underrepresented on 50% (6 of 12) of boards relative to gender equity and 67% (8 of 12) of boards relative to gender parity. Conclusions: Women were found to be underrepresented on 50% or more of the editorial boards of the JAMA Network Journals. This finding reflects gender inequities in academic publishing and the broader biomedical enterprise, which limits advances in the biomedical sciences and health care. Those JAMA Network Journals that continue to underrepresent women on their editorial boards are urged to remediate this longstanding issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 176780835 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Gender Representation on Editorial Boards of JAMA Network Journals. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schaechter%2C+Judith+D%2E%22">Schaechter, Judith D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jacobs%2C+Jeremy+W%2E%22">Jacobs, Jeremy W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Booth%2C+Garrett+S%2E%22">Booth, Garrett S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dupont%2C+William+D%2E%22">Dupont, William D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Silver%2C+Julie+K%2E%22">Silver, Julie K.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Women's+Health+%2815409996%29%22">Journal of Women's Health (15409996)</searchLink>. Apr2024, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p446-452. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+administration%22">Health services administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-sectional+method%22">Cross-sectional method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+%26+inclusion+policies%22">Diversity & inclusion policies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+distribution%22">Sex distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Benchmarking+%28Management%29%22">Benchmarking (Management)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+discrimination%22">Sex discrimination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Publishing%22">Publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Women's+employment%22">Women's employment</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: Underrepresentation of women on editorial boards of biomedical journals has occurred for decades. The JAMA Network Journals have substantial and broad impact on advances in the biomedical sciences. We sought to determine the current status of gender representation on editorial boards of the 12 JAMA Network Journals. Methods: The gender of each editorial board member of the 12 JAMA Network Journals was classified based on review of online sources. The percentage of women on each board (i.e., number of women relative to total members) was calculated and compared to gender equity and parity benchmarks. The gender equity benchmark for each journal was defined as the percentage of women physicians in the medical specialty reflecting the journal's content based on Association of American Medical Colleges data. The gender parity benchmark for all journals was defined as 50% women. Results: There was considerable variation in the representation of women on the editorial boards of the JAMA Network Journals relative to gender equity and parity benchmarks. Women were underrepresented on 50% (6 of 12) of boards relative to gender equity and 67% (8 of 12) of boards relative to gender parity. Conclusions: Women were found to be underrepresented on 50% or more of the editorial boards of the JAMA Network Journals. This finding reflects gender inequities in academic publishing and the broader biomedical enterprise, which limits advances in the biomedical sciences and health care. Those JAMA Network Journals that continue to underrepresent women on their editorial boards are urged to remediate this longstanding issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=176780835 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0685 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 446 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Health services administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method Type: general – SubjectFull: Diversity & inclusion policies Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex distribution Type: general – SubjectFull: Benchmarking (Management) Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex discrimination Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Women's employment Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Gender Representation on Editorial Boards of JAMA Network Journals. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schaechter, Judith D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jacobs, Jeremy W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Booth, Garrett S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dupont, William D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Silver, Julie K. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 15409996 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Women's Health (15409996) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |