Sexual Minorities, Religion, and Self‐Rated Health in the United States.
Saved in:
| Title: | Sexual Minorities, Religion, and Self‐Rated Health in the United States. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cranney, Stephen |
| Source: | Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Jun2024, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p240-264. 25p. |
| Subjects: | Sexual minorities, Religiousness, Health, Religion, LGBTQ+ people |
| Abstract: | While religiosity has generally been found to be associated with health, sexual minority individuals are a theoretically unique population in the literature. Because of sample size issues, the extent to which sexual minority individuals differ from nonsexual minority individuals in the health and religion relationship has been difficult to comprehensively test; additionally, the theoretically germane but often hypothesized distinction between affirming and nonaffirming religions has remained largely untested. This study draws on the Cooperative Election Study, a nationally representative survey with a relatively large sexual minority sample (∼6600), and finds that (1) sexual minority individuals are less likely to affiliate with a religion; (2) sexual minority individuals report poorer health; (3) sexual minority individuals do enjoy an overall health benefit from religiosity, but this benefit is attenuated (compared to nonsexual minority individuals) in the case of affiliation; and (4) there is some ambiguous evidence for an affirming religiosity effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | While religiosity has generally been found to be associated with health, sexual minority individuals are a theoretically unique population in the literature. Because of sample size issues, the extent to which sexual minority individuals differ from nonsexual minority individuals in the health and religion relationship has been difficult to comprehensively test; additionally, the theoretically germane but often hypothesized distinction between affirming and nonaffirming religions has remained largely untested. This study draws on the Cooperative Election Study, a nationally representative survey with a relatively large sexual minority sample (∼6600), and finds that (1) sexual minority individuals are less likely to affiliate with a religion; (2) sexual minority individuals report poorer health; (3) sexual minority individuals do enjoy an overall health benefit from religiosity, but this benefit is attenuated (compared to nonsexual minority individuals) in the case of affiliation; and (4) there is some ambiguous evidence for an affirming religiosity effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00218294 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jssr.12884 |
