View in EDS

Community health worker training on older adults: A qualitative needs assessment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Community health worker training on older adults: A qualitative needs assessment.
Authors: Spadoni, Nora, Baron, Aliza, Zavala, Elizabeth, Burns, Maureen, Draw, Kandis, Hernandez, Wandy, Bennett, Jenil, Gleason, Lauren J., Levine, Stacie
Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Sep2024, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p2825-2833. 9p.
Subjects: Public hospitals, Proprietary hospitals, Qualitative research, Research funding, Health, At-risk people, Interviewing, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Frontline personnel, Metropolitan areas, Research methodology, Needs assessment, Health promotion, Comparative studies, Well-being, Inter-observer reliability
Abstract: Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health personnel who serve as liaisons between vulnerable patient populations and the healthcare system. They are instrumental in health promotion and education for urban‐dwelling older adults. However, no research exists on training that CHWs receive on age‐friendly health care. This article explores CHW education on the 4Ms of an Age‐Friendly Health System and identifies areas where additional training may be necessary. Methods: As part of a two‐pronged qualitative needs assessment, four focus groups were held with a total of 17 CHWs and semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including both healthcare providers and social workers. Focus group and interview transcripts were then analyzed for major themes in Dedoose, a qualitative coding software. Results: Clinicians most often identified Mentation and Mobility as areas where CHWs can have the greatest impact. Correspondingly, CHWs felt under‐equipped to assist patients in these areas and expressed strong interest in additional training. In general, CHWs and clinicians agreed that Medications and What Matters do not fall under CHW scope of practice. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the critical role that CHWs can play in promoting the health and well‐being of urban‐dwelling older adults. However, we also demonstrate that many CHWs lack adequate training in age‐friendly care. To meet the social and medical needs of a rapidly aging US population, there is a pertinent need to develop a novel community health worker training curriculum on Mentation and Mobility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the American Geriatrics Society is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health personnel who serve as liaisons between vulnerable patient populations and the healthcare system. They are instrumental in health promotion and education for urban‐dwelling older adults. However, no research exists on training that CHWs receive on age‐friendly health care. This article explores CHW education on the 4Ms of an Age‐Friendly Health System and identifies areas where additional training may be necessary. Methods: As part of a two‐pronged qualitative needs assessment, four focus groups were held with a total of 17 CHWs and semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians, including both healthcare providers and social workers. Focus group and interview transcripts were then analyzed for major themes in Dedoose, a qualitative coding software. Results: Clinicians most often identified Mentation and Mobility as areas where CHWs can have the greatest impact. Correspondingly, CHWs felt under‐equipped to assist patients in these areas and expressed strong interest in additional training. In general, CHWs and clinicians agreed that Medications and What Matters do not fall under CHW scope of practice. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the critical role that CHWs can play in promoting the health and well‐being of urban‐dwelling older adults. However, we also demonstrate that many CHWs lack adequate training in age‐friendly care. To meet the social and medical needs of a rapidly aging US population, there is a pertinent need to develop a novel community health worker training curriculum on Mentation and Mobility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00028614
DOI:10.1111/jgs.19077