Costs and economic impact of student‐led clinics—A systematic review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Costs and economic impact of student‐led clinics—A systematic review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mitchell, Debra, Maloney, Stephen, Robinson, Luke, Haines, Terry, Foo, Jonathan |
| Source: | Medical Education. Apr2025, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p368-381. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Supervision of employees, CINAHL database, Cost benefit analysis, Descriptive statistics, Medical students, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Health facilities, College students, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems |
| Geographic Terms: | Victoria |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Student‐led clinics generate a range of benefits to multiple stakeholder groups. Students receive important educational opportunities to advance in their training. Patients with limited access to care may access effective care or a higher amount of effective care and so reduce burden on the health care system. The financial viability of student‐led clinics run by universities is uncertain, and establishing this is complicated by the range of stakeholder costs and benefits that may be involved. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence related to the costs and benefits of student‐led clinics and report the methods that have been used to measure these costs and benefits. Method: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE All, PsychInfo, CINAHL, A+ Education (Informit), ERIC (ProQuest) and ProQuest Education databases for studies that reported the costs and/or economic benefits of student‐led clinics from inception through August 2023. Studies were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted including study characteristics, student‐led clinic description and economic outcomes. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to the heterogeneity of studies. Results: Of 349 potentially eligible studies, 24 were included. Nine studies (38%) used an outcome description‐monetised approach; four used partial economic evaluation (17%); four employed cost description (17%); two used cost approximation (8%); two used cost analyses (8%); and one was a full economic analysis (4%). Studies examined costs or benefits, from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, but few examined both. Only six studies (25%) had established the clinical effectiveness of their service. Student clinics generate costs for universities in supplying supervision, capital and consumables. Benefits are shared by patients, students, universities and the broader health system, however, economic evaluations to date have largely ignored or not monetised/valued these benefits. Conclusions: Student‐led clinics involve many different stakeholders, each of whom may incur costs and reap benefits. This complicates how we can go about trying to establish the economic efficiency and viability of student‐led clinics. Measurement of both costs and benefits is needed to understand the efficiency of student‐led clinics in comparison to alternatives. Without the full picture, decision‐makers may make decisions that are ill‐informed and lead to a loss of benefit for society. Student‐led clinics generate benefits to multiple stakeholders including students, patients the health system & universities. This paper explores the need to measure costs & benefits to ascertain value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
