How can coaching and coaching psychology avoid doing harm and do good for coachees, specifically those who have underlying mental health concerns? Calls to action and practical suggestions to ensure ethical practice.
Saved in:
| Title: | How can coaching and coaching psychology avoid doing harm and do good for coachees, specifically those who have underlying mental health concerns? Calls to action and practical suggestions to ensure ethical practice. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hepworth, Claire (AUTHOR), Day, Fiona (AUTHOR), Poate-Joyner, Annabel (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | International Coaching Psychology Review. Spring2025, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p23-35. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Coaching psychology, Mental health, Coaching (Athletics), Public health, Professional ethics, Altruism, Care ethics (Philosophy) |
| Abstract: | Non-maleficence (avoiding doing harm) and beneficence (actively doing good) are essential ethical considerations for any intervention including for coaching and coaching psychology. Whilst the authors assume 'benevolent intent' and that all coaches and coaching psychologists want to avoid doing harm and to positively do good, we believe that there are times when our coachees may have mental health concerns which are outwith the competency of a non-clinical coach or coaching psychologist. In our opinion paper, we outline the issues as we see them, and make urgent calls to action, that as coaches and coaching psychologists we can and must do better to safeguard the public and raise awareness of opportunity so that the coaching profession can have a powerful voice in the UK and internationally across public health, learning, education, wider society. We make recommendations to coaching and coaching psychology professional bodies in the UK and beyond to take action with regards to this vital aspect of coaching and coaching psychology governance. We also provide some practical suggestions for coaching practitioners and a case study for reflection for coaches to use for their professional development, pending action by professional bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Coaching Psychology Review is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 184676721 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How can coaching and coaching psychology avoid doing harm and do good for coachees, specifically those who have underlying mental health concerns? Calls to action and practical suggestions to ensure ethical practice. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hepworth%2C+Claire%22">Hepworth, Claire</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Day%2C+Fiona%22">Day, Fiona</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Poate-Joyner%2C+Annabel%22">Poate-Joyner, Annabel</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Coaching+Psychology+Review%22">International Coaching Psychology Review</searchLink>. Spring2025, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p23-35. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coaching+psychology%22">Coaching psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health%22">Mental health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coaching+%28Athletics%29%22">Coaching (Athletics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+ethics%22">Professional ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Altruism%22">Altruism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Care+ethics+%28Philosophy%29%22">Care ethics (Philosophy)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Non-maleficence (avoiding doing harm) and beneficence (actively doing good) are essential ethical considerations for any intervention including for coaching and coaching psychology. Whilst the authors assume 'benevolent intent' and that all coaches and coaching psychologists want to avoid doing harm and to positively do good, we believe that there are times when our coachees may have mental health concerns which are outwith the competency of a non-clinical coach or coaching psychologist. In our opinion paper, we outline the issues as we see them, and make urgent calls to action, that as coaches and coaching psychologists we can and must do better to safeguard the public and raise awareness of opportunity so that the coaching profession can have a powerful voice in the UK and internationally across public health, learning, education, wider society. We make recommendations to coaching and coaching psychology professional bodies in the UK and beyond to take action with regards to this vital aspect of coaching and coaching psychology governance. We also provide some practical suggestions for coaching practitioners and a case study for reflection for coaches to use for their professional development, pending action by professional bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of International Coaching Psychology Review is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=184676721 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.53841/bpsicpr.2025.20.1.23 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 23 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Coaching psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental health Type: general – SubjectFull: Coaching (Athletics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Public health Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Altruism Type: general – SubjectFull: Care ethics (Philosophy) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How can coaching and coaching psychology avoid doing harm and do good for coachees, specifically those who have underlying mental health concerns? Calls to action and practical suggestions to ensure ethical practice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hepworth, Claire – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Day, Fiona – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Poate-Joyner, Annabel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Spring2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 17502764 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: International Coaching Psychology Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
