Exploring Barriers to Inclusivity: Systematic Analysis of Exclusion Criteria and Potential Bias in Clinical Cancer Trials for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions in European Protocols.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring Barriers to Inclusivity: Systematic Analysis of Exclusion Criteria and Potential Bias in Clinical Cancer Trials for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions in European Protocols.
Authors: Dahò, Margherita (AUTHOR), Coppini, Veronica (AUTHOR), Ferrari, Maria Vittoria (AUTHOR), Ferraris, Giulia (AUTHOR), Sanchini, Virginia (AUTHOR), Monzani, Dario (AUTHOR), Grasso, Roberto (AUTHOR), Agnello, Chiara (AUTHOR), Badalamenti, Giuseppe (AUTHOR), Algeri, Laura (AUTHOR), Pravettoni, Gabriella (AUTHOR)
Source: Psycho-Oncology. May2025, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p1-8. 8p.
Subjects: Neurological disorders, Mental illness, Research protocols, Poor communities, Ethical problems, Clinical trials, Diversity & inclusion policies, Inclusion (Disability rights)
Abstract: Background: Cancer clinical trials often employ exclusion criteria that can impact vulnerable populations, particularly individuals with psychological, psychiatric, or neurological conditions. Aims: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and nature of exclusion criteria in clinical trials for prostate, breast, and lung cancers. Methods: The EU Clinical Trials Register identified 51 protocols uploaded between 2022 and 2024. Thematic content analysis categorized exclusion criteria, and the justifications provided, while frequency analysis quantified their prevalence. Results: After excluding five protocols (two non‐English and three inaccessible), the final dataset comprised 46 protocols: 13 for prostate cancer (22.8%), 24 for breast cancer (42.1%), and 9 for lung cancer (15.8%). Exclusion criteria targeting vulnerable populations were present in 78.3% of protocols, categorized into five themes: psychiatric conditions (24.6%), neurological conditions (22.8%), other psychological conditions (22.8%), legal/guardianship status (5.3%), and unspecified conditions (24.6%). Compliance concerns (39.1%) were the most common justification, followed by informed consent challenges (32.6%), safety risks (13%), drug interference (10.9%), and not in the best interest (4.3%). Notably, 29.1% of protocols lacked justification for exclusions, raising ethical and transparency concerns. Conclusions: The exclusion of vulnerable populations may limit the inclusivity and generalizability of cancer research. Heuristic biases and systemic practices can potentially influence this. Exploring the role of these factors and considering adaptive trial designs, along with providing detailed justifications for exclusion criteria, could support more equitable and representative clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 185453333
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Exploring Barriers to Inclusivity: Systematic Analysis of Exclusion Criteria and Potential Bias in Clinical Cancer Trials for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions in European Protocols.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dahò%2C+Margherita%22">Dahò, Margherita</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Coppini%2C+Veronica%22">Coppini, Veronica</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferrari%2C+Maria+Vittoria%22">Ferrari, Maria Vittoria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferraris%2C+Giulia%22">Ferraris, Giulia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sanchini%2C+Virginia%22">Sanchini, Virginia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Monzani%2C+Dario%22">Monzani, Dario</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grasso%2C+Roberto%22">Grasso, Roberto</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Agnello%2C+Chiara%22">Agnello, Chiara</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Badalamenti%2C+Giuseppe%22">Badalamenti, Giuseppe</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Algeri%2C+Laura%22">Algeri, Laura</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pravettoni%2C+Gabriella%22">Pravettoni, Gabriella</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psycho-Oncology%22">Psycho-Oncology</searchLink>. May2025, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p1-8. 8p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neurological+disorders%22">Neurological disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+illness%22">Mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+protocols%22">Research protocols</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poor+communities%22">Poor communities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethical+problems%22">Ethical problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+trials%22">Clinical trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+%26+inclusion+policies%22">Diversity & inclusion policies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inclusion+%28Disability+rights%29%22">Inclusion (Disability rights)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Cancer clinical trials often employ exclusion criteria that can impact vulnerable populations, particularly individuals with psychological, psychiatric, or neurological conditions. Aims: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and nature of exclusion criteria in clinical trials for prostate, breast, and lung cancers. Methods: The EU Clinical Trials Register identified 51 protocols uploaded between 2022 and 2024. Thematic content analysis categorized exclusion criteria, and the justifications provided, while frequency analysis quantified their prevalence. Results: After excluding five protocols (two non‐English and three inaccessible), the final dataset comprised 46 protocols: 13 for prostate cancer (22.8%), 24 for breast cancer (42.1%), and 9 for lung cancer (15.8%). Exclusion criteria targeting vulnerable populations were present in 78.3% of protocols, categorized into five themes: psychiatric conditions (24.6%), neurological conditions (22.8%), other psychological conditions (22.8%), legal/guardianship status (5.3%), and unspecified conditions (24.6%). Compliance concerns (39.1%) were the most common justification, followed by informed consent challenges (32.6%), safety risks (13%), drug interference (10.9%), and not in the best interest (4.3%). Notably, 29.1% of protocols lacked justification for exclusions, raising ethical and transparency concerns. Conclusions: The exclusion of vulnerable populations may limit the inclusivity and generalizability of cancer research. Heuristic biases and systemic practices can potentially influence this. Exploring the role of these factors and considering adaptive trial designs, along with providing detailed justifications for exclusion criteria, could support more equitable and representative clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=185453333
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/pon.70182
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Neurological disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental illness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research protocols
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Poor communities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethical problems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diversity & inclusion policies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Inclusion (Disability rights)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Exploring Barriers to Inclusivity: Systematic Analysis of Exclusion Criteria and Potential Bias in Clinical Cancer Trials for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions in European Protocols.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dahò, Margherita
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Coppini, Veronica
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ferrari, Maria Vittoria
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ferraris, Giulia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sanchini, Virginia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Monzani, Dario
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Grasso, Roberto
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Agnello, Chiara
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Badalamenti, Giuseppe
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Algeri, Laura
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pravettoni, Gabriella
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10579249
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psycho-Oncology
              Type: main
ResultId 1