Bidirectional Dynamics Between Stress‐Reactive Rumination and Negative Affect: Evidence From a Multimethods Study in Individuals With High Trait Anxiety.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Bidirectional Dynamics Between Stress‐Reactive Rumination and Negative Affect: Evidence From a Multimethods Study in Individuals With High Trait Anxiety.
Authors: Qingzi, Zhu (AUTHOR), Lanxin, Peng (AUTHOR), Lijing, Niu (AUTHOR), Yuanyuan, Zeng (AUTHOR), Xiayan, Chen (AUTHOR), Zini, Chen (AUTHOR), Haowei, Dai (AUTHOR), Ruibin, Zhang (AUTHOR), Stoyanov, Drozdstoy (AUTHOR)
Source: Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269). 9/2/2025, Vol. 2025, p1-12. 12p.
Subjects: Affect (Psychology), Rumination (Cognition), Longitudinal method, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Psychotherapy, Emotional stability, Ecological momentary assessments (Clinical psychology)
Abstract: Background: Stress‐reactive rumination (SR)—the tendency to repetitively think about stressors—has been proposed as a key cognitive mechanism linking trait anxiety to persistent negative affect (NA). However, the dynamic and context‐dependent nature of this relationship remains unclear. This study employed a multimethod experimental design to investigate the manifestation of SR in individuals with high trait anxiety (HTA) across different contexts and to examine whether SR and NA demonstrate a bidirectional predictive relationship over time. Methods: A total of 62 participants (31 with high and 31 with low trait anxiety (LTA), respectively) completed a 14‐day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) four times/day to record dynamic fluctuations in SR and NA over time in daily life. Afterward, participants underwent the Trier social stress test (TSST) to examine SR and NA responses under acute laboratory stress. Cross‐lagged models assessed temporal associations between SR and NA in both contexts. Results: EMA data showed that individuals with HTA reported significantly higher SR and NA than their low anxiety counterparts (p < 0.001). Cross‐lagged analyses revealed a significant bidirectional predictive relationship between SR and NA, although this relationship was present only in the HTA group (SR → NA: b = 0.159, p < 0.001; NA → SR: b = 0.072, p = 0.038). In the laboratory, SR and NA were successfully induced by stress, particularly in the HTA group (p < 0.001), but cross‐lagged effects were not observed. Conclusions: In individuals with HTA, SR demonstrates both persistence and context‐dependent reactivity. The observed reciprocal dynamics between SR and NA in real‐life settings underscore the role of attentional control deficits in maintaining emotional dysregulation. Interventions targeting SR may disrupt this maladaptive cycle and reduce anxiety vulnerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 187694170
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Bidirectional Dynamics Between Stress‐Reactive Rumination and Negative Affect: Evidence From a Multimethods Study in Individuals With High Trait Anxiety.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Qingzi%2C+Zhu%22&quot;&gt;Qingzi, Zhu&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lanxin%2C+Peng%22&quot;&gt;Lanxin, Peng&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lijing%2C+Niu%22&quot;&gt;Lijing, Niu&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Yuanyuan%2C+Zeng%22&quot;&gt;Yuanyuan, Zeng&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Xiayan%2C+Chen%22&quot;&gt;Xiayan, Chen&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Zini%2C+Chen%22&quot;&gt;Zini, Chen&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Haowei%2C+Dai%22&quot;&gt;Haowei, Dai&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ruibin%2C+Zhang%22&quot;&gt;Ruibin, Zhang&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Stoyanov%2C+Drozdstoy%22&quot;&gt;Stoyanov, Drozdstoy&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Depression+%26+Anxiety+%281091-4269%29%22&quot;&gt;Depression &amp; Anxiety (1091-4269)&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 9/2/2025, Vol. 2025, p1-12. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Affect+%28Psychology%29%22&quot;&gt;Affect (Psychology)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Rumination+%28Cognition%29%22&quot;&gt;Rumination (Cognition)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Longitudinal+method%22&quot;&gt;Longitudinal method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22State-Trait+Anxiety+Inventory%22&quot;&gt;State-Trait Anxiety Inventory&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychotherapy%22&quot;&gt;Psychotherapy&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Emotional+stability%22&quot;&gt;Emotional stability&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Ecological+momentary+assessments+%28Clinical+psychology%29%22&quot;&gt;Ecological momentary assessments (Clinical psychology)&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Stress‐reactive rumination (SR)—the tendency to repetitively think about stressors—has been proposed as a key cognitive mechanism linking trait anxiety to persistent negative affect (NA). However, the dynamic and context‐dependent nature of this relationship remains unclear. This study employed a multimethod experimental design to investigate the manifestation of SR in individuals with high trait anxiety (HTA) across different contexts and to examine whether SR and NA demonstrate a bidirectional predictive relationship over time. Methods: A total of 62 participants (31 with high and 31 with low trait anxiety (LTA), respectively) completed a 14‐day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) four times/day to record dynamic fluctuations in SR and NA over time in daily life. Afterward, participants underwent the Trier social stress test (TSST) to examine SR and NA responses under acute laboratory stress. Cross‐lagged models assessed temporal associations between SR and NA in both contexts. Results: EMA data showed that individuals with HTA reported significantly higher SR and NA than their low anxiety counterparts (p &lt; 0.001). Cross‐lagged analyses revealed a significant bidirectional predictive relationship between SR and NA, although this relationship was present only in the HTA group (SR → NA: b = 0.159, p &lt; 0.001; NA → SR: b = 0.072, p = 0.038). In the laboratory, SR and NA were successfully induced by stress, particularly in the HTA group (p &lt; 0.001), but cross‐lagged effects were not observed. Conclusions: In individuals with HTA, SR demonstrates both persistence and context‐dependent reactivity. The observed reciprocal dynamics between SR and NA in real‐life settings underscore the role of attentional control deficits in maintaining emotional dysregulation. Interventions targeting SR may disrupt this maladaptive cycle and reduce anxiety vulnerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Depression &amp; Anxiety (1091-4269) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=187694170
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1155/da/2503361
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Affect (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rumination (Cognition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychotherapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotional stability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ecological momentary assessments (Clinical psychology)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Bidirectional Dynamics Between Stress‐Reactive Rumination and Negative Affect: Evidence From a Multimethods Study in Individuals With High Trait Anxiety.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Qingzi, Zhu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lanxin, Peng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lijing, Niu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yuanyuan, Zeng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Xiayan, Chen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zini, Chen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Haowei, Dai
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ruibin, Zhang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 02
              M: 09
              Text: 9/2/2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10914269
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 2025
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
              Type: main
ResultId 1