Relationship between anthropometric indicators and cognitive function in older women.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Relationship between anthropometric indicators and cognitive function in older women.
Authors: Zhao, Xiaoguang (AUTHOR), Tang, Huan (AUTHOR), Duan, Xiaosha (AUTHOR), Shen, Shaoshuai (AUTHOR), Wang, Jin (AUTHOR)
Source: Health Care for Women International. 2025, Vol. 46 Issue 12, p1409-1423. 15p.
Subjects: Cognition disorder risk factors, Risk assessment, Cross-sectional method, Body mass index, Statistical hypothesis testing, Data analysis, Research funding, Multiple regression analysis, Psychology of women, Analysis of covariance, Descriptive statistics, Waist circumference, Hip joint, Neuropsychological tests, Statistics, Anthropometry, Comparative studies, Data analysis software, Old age
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: The authors aimed to explore the association between anthropometric indicators and cognitive function and determine which aspects of anthropometric indicators are most closely related to cognitive function. A sum of 3269 older women were included in this study. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, calf circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio were obtained to reflect anthropometric indicators. Cognitive function was assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Researchers revealed statistically significant differences in total MMSE scores among the low, medium, and high groups of BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and calf circumference. Researchers also observed that calf circumference, hip circumference, and waist circumference are significantly associated with the total MMSE score. Our findings highlighted that older women with greater BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and calf circumference have a better level of cognitive function. Calf circumference is the most closely anthropometric indicator related to cognitive function in Chinese older women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Health Care for Women International is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first