Regulation of Alcohol‐Free and Low‐Alcohol Drinks: Learning From a Comparative Analysis of Eight Countries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Regulation of Alcohol‐Free and Low‐Alcohol Drinks: Learning From a Comparative Analysis of Eight Countries.
Authors: Burton, Robyn (AUTHOR), Angus, Kathryn (AUTHOR), Morgan, Amber (AUTHOR), Howell, Rebecca (AUTHOR), Critchlow, Nathan (AUTHOR), Kersbergen, Inge (AUTHOR), Holmes, John (AUTHOR), Bowdring, Molly A. (AUTHOR), Miller, Mia (AUTHOR), Waleewong, Orratai (AUTHOR), Halme, Aleksi (AUTHOR), Voogt, Carmen (AUTHOR), Fitzgerald, Niamh (AUTHOR)
Source: Drug & Alcohol Review. Mar2026, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p1-17. 17p.
Subjects: Government regulation, Taxation, Marketing, Label design, Legal doctrines, Non-alcoholic beer, Public health
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom, Australia
Abstract: Introduction: Governance of alcohol‐free and low‐alcohol (No/Lo) drinks has the potential to influence their public health impact. However, regulation remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify, summarise and compare formal legal frameworks, non‐binding government guidance and recognised self‐regulatory frameworks for the labelling, taxation, licensing and condition of sale and marketing of No/Lo drinks across a diverse set of countries. Methods: We conducted a desk‐based analysis, supplemented by expert input. Eight case study countries (Australia, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Thailand, the United Kingdom [UK] and the United States of America) were selected for their diversity in geography, alcohol consumption and policy environments. Targeted searches identified documents for determining how No/Lo products were regulated in relation to their labelling, taxation, licensing and conditions of sale and marketing. Data were extracted, tabulated and reviewed for accuracy. Results: Regulatory thresholds (%ABV) that determine when drinks fall under alcohol legislation vary widely both across and within countries and definitions of No/Lo products are uncommon. For example, drinks can be labelled as alcohol‐free at ≤ 0.05% alcohol by volume (ABV) in the UK, but ≤ 1.15% ABV in parts of Australia. Sales of drinks below defined thresholds generally do not require a premises licence. Marketing restrictions were generally shaped by those for standard alcoholic drinks, although new self‐regulatory guidance has been developed in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK. Discussion and Conclusions: Governance of No/Lo drinks is fragmented and inconsistent, with definitions and regulatory thresholds varying both across countries and between policy areas within countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 192476824
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Regulation of Alcohol‐Free and Low‐Alcohol Drinks: Learning From a Comparative Analysis of Eight Countries.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burton%2C+Robyn%22">Burton, Robyn</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Angus%2C+Kathryn%22">Angus, Kathryn</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morgan%2C+Amber%22">Morgan, Amber</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Howell%2C+Rebecca%22">Howell, Rebecca</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Critchlow%2C+Nathan%22">Critchlow, Nathan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kersbergen%2C+Inge%22">Kersbergen, Inge</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holmes%2C+John%22">Holmes, John</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bowdring%2C+Molly+A%2E%22">Bowdring, Molly A.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Miller%2C+Mia%22">Miller, Mia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Waleewong%2C+Orratai%22">Waleewong, Orratai</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Halme%2C+Aleksi%22">Halme, Aleksi</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Voogt%2C+Carmen%22">Voogt, Carmen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fitzgerald%2C+Niamh%22">Fitzgerald, Niamh</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Drug+%26+Alcohol+Review%22">Drug & Alcohol Review</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p1-17. 17p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+regulation%22">Government regulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Taxation%22">Taxation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marketing%22">Marketing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Label+design%22">Label design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+doctrines%22">Legal doctrines</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Non-alcoholic+beer%22">Non-alcoholic beer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: Governance of alcohol‐free and low‐alcohol (No/Lo) drinks has the potential to influence their public health impact. However, regulation remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify, summarise and compare formal legal frameworks, non‐binding government guidance and recognised self‐regulatory frameworks for the labelling, taxation, licensing and condition of sale and marketing of No/Lo drinks across a diverse set of countries. Methods: We conducted a desk‐based analysis, supplemented by expert input. Eight case study countries (Australia, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Thailand, the United Kingdom [UK] and the United States of America) were selected for their diversity in geography, alcohol consumption and policy environments. Targeted searches identified documents for determining how No/Lo products were regulated in relation to their labelling, taxation, licensing and conditions of sale and marketing. Data were extracted, tabulated and reviewed for accuracy. Results: Regulatory thresholds (%ABV) that determine when drinks fall under alcohol legislation vary widely both across and within countries and definitions of No/Lo products are uncommon. For example, drinks can be labelled as alcohol‐free at ≤ 0.05% alcohol by volume (ABV) in the UK, but ≤ 1.15% ABV in parts of Australia. Sales of drinks below defined thresholds generally do not require a premises licence. Marketing restrictions were generally shaped by those for standard alcoholic drinks, although new self‐regulatory guidance has been developed in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK. Discussion and Conclusions: Governance of No/Lo drinks is fragmented and inconsistent, with definitions and regulatory thresholds varying both across countries and between policy areas within countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=192476824
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/dar.70126
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Government regulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Taxation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Marketing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Label design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Legal doctrines
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Non-alcoholic beer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Regulation of Alcohol‐Free and Low‐Alcohol Drinks: Learning From a Comparative Analysis of Eight Countries.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burton, Robyn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Angus, Kathryn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Morgan, Amber
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Howell, Rebecca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Critchlow, Nathan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kersbergen, Inge
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Holmes, John
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bowdring, Molly A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Miller, Mia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Waleewong, Orratai
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Halme, Aleksi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Voogt, Carmen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fitzgerald, Niamh
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09595236
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 45
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Drug & Alcohol Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1