Behavioural difficulties and quality of life in children with borderline intellectual functioning: A study of self- and parent-reported discrepancies in Thailand.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Behavioural difficulties and quality of life in children with borderline intellectual functioning: A study of self- and parent-reported discrepancies in Thailand.
Authors: Boonchooduang, Nonglak (AUTHOR), Likhitweerawong, Narueporn (AUTHOR), Phetsena, Maniwan (AUTHOR), Mekpoti, Nisochol (AUTHOR), Louthrenoo, Orawan (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. Jun2026, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p151-160. 10p.
Subjects: Risk assessment, Self-evaluation, Parents, Cross-sectional method, Pearson correlation (Statistics), Effect sizes (Statistics), Statistical power analysis, T-test (Statistics), Data analysis, Research funding, Questionnaires, Parent attitudes, Descriptive statistics, Intellectual disabilities, Behavior disorders in children, Thai people, Quality of life, Social skills, Academic achievement, Intraclass correlation, Statistics, Psychological tests, Sociodemographic factors, Data analysis software, Comorbidity, Regression analysis, Disease complications, Children
Geographic Terms: Thailand
Abstract: Background: Borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) involves cognitive and adaptive limitations affecting behaviour and quality of life (QoL). This study compared self- and parent-reported behavioural difficulties and QoL in Thai children with BIF and identified associated factors. Method: Fifty children aged 8–15 years with BIF and their parents completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Differences between child and parent reports were analysed using paired t-tests. Predictors of QoL were analysed using hierarchical multiple regression. Results: Parents reported fewer conduct problems, peer problems, and total difficulties than children, while rating prosocial behaviours higher. Self-reported QoL scores were higher, especially in social and school domains. Lower self-reported difficulties and lower paternal education predicted higher self-reported QoL, while higher maternal education and IQ predicted better parent-reported QoL. Conclusion: Discrepancies between self- and parent-reported outcomes highlighted the importance of integrating both perspectives in care planning for children with BIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first