View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.
Authors: Dopkins, Stephen (AUTHOR), Sargent, Jesse (AUTHOR), Ngo, CatherineTrinh (AUTHOR)
Source: Memory. Apr2010, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p272-283. 12p. 5 Graphs.
Subjects: Response styles (Examinations), Recognition (Psychology), Positive psychology, Semantic differential technique, Sequence (Linguistics)
Abstract: On each trial of the experimental procedure the participant read a list of words and made successive recognition judgements to multiple test words. The bias for a given recognition judgement was more conservative if the judgement followed a correct positive response to a target than if it followed a correct negative response to a lure. Similar results were not observed for successive semantic recognition judgements. The bias shift was greater when the study list was short than when the list was long. The results suggest that participants in a recognition task have a sense of the size of the set of targets that might possibly be presented on the next trial and that, under conditions in which a word can only be presented once during the test phase, their bias becomes more conservative after a positive response to a target because the set is depleted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 49261562
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dopkins%2C+Stephen%22">Dopkins, Stephen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sargent%2C+Jesse%22">Sargent, Jesse</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ngo%2C+CatherineTrinh%22">Ngo, CatherineTrinh</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink>. Apr2010, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p272-283. 12p. 5 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+styles+%28Examinations%29%22">Response styles (Examinations)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recognition+%28Psychology%29%22">Recognition (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Positive+psychology%22">Positive psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Semantic+differential+technique%22">Semantic differential technique</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sequence+%28Linguistics%29%22">Sequence (Linguistics)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: On each trial of the experimental procedure the participant read a list of words and made successive recognition judgements to multiple test words. The bias for a given recognition judgement was more conservative if the judgement followed a correct positive response to a target than if it followed a correct negative response to a lure. Similar results were not observed for successive semantic recognition judgements. The bias shift was greater when the study list was short than when the list was long. The results suggest that participants in a recognition task have a sense of the size of the set of targets that might possibly be presented on the next trial and that, under conditions in which a word can only be presented once during the test phase, their bias becomes more conservative after a positive response to a target because the set is depleted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=49261562
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09658211003601506
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 272
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Response styles (Examinations)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Recognition (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Positive psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Semantic differential technique
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sequence (Linguistics)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dopkins, Stephen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sargent, Jesse
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ngo, CatherineTrinh
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09658211
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 18
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Memory
              Type: main
ResultId 1