A multi-site randomized controlled trial of a cognitive skills programme for male mentally disordered offenders: social–cognitive outcomes.
Saved in:
| Title: | A multi-site randomized controlled trial of a cognitive skills programme for male mentally disordered offenders: social–cognitive outcomes. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cullen, A. E., Clarke, A. Y., Kuipers, E., Hodgins, S., Dean, K., Fahy, T. |
| Source: | Psychological Medicine. Mar2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p557-569. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Chi-squared test, Cognition, Cognitive therapy, Interviewing, Longitudinal method, Classification of mental disorders, Health outcome assessment, Problem solving, Questionnaires, Regression analysis, Risk assessment, Statistical sampling, Scales (Weighing instruments), Statistics, T-test (Statistics), U-statistics, Criminals with mental illness, Sample size (Statistics), Data analysis, Effect sizes (Statistics), Randomized controlled trials, Treatment effectiveness, Data analysis software, Descriptive statistics |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| Abstract: | BackgroundCognitive skills programmes have been associated with improvements on psychometric measures and reductions in antisocial behaviour in mentally disordered offenders (MDOs). However, to date there have been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of such programmes with this population. In the first RCT of a cognitive skills programme with MDOs we aimed to determine if participation in the Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R) programme was associated with improvements in social–cognitive skills and thinking styles.MethodA total of 84 men with a primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder and a history of violence were recruited from medium-secure forensic units and allocated to receive R&R (n=44) or treatment as usual (TAU; n=40). At baseline and post-treatment interviews, participants completed questionnaires to assess social problem-solving, criminal attitudes, anger experience, blame externalizing and perspective-taking. Researchers were not blind to group status.ResultsThe R&R group demonstrated significant improvements on measures of social problem-solving relative to the TAU group, some of which were maintained at 12 months post-treatment. Only half of those allocated to receive R&R completed the full programme. In post-hoc analyses programme completers showed improvements in social problem-solving at the end of treatment and changes in criminal attitudes at 12 months post-treatment.ConclusionsAmong male MDOs, R&R participation was associated with improvements in social–cognitive skills, some of which were maintained for up to 12 months post-treatment. Our finding that programme completers do better may reflect pre-treatment patient characteristics. This study establishes that multi-site RCTs can be conducted in medium-secure forensic units. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Psychological Medicine is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 70574139 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A multi-site randomized controlled trial of a cognitive skills programme for male mentally disordered offenders: social–cognitive outcomes. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cullen%2C+A%2E+E%2E%22">Cullen, A. E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clarke%2C+A%2E+Y%2E%22">Clarke, A. Y.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kuipers%2C+E%2E%22">Kuipers, E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hodgins%2C+S%2E%22">Hodgins, S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dean%2C+K%2E%22">Dean, K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fahy%2C+T%2E%22">Fahy, T.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Medicine%22">Psychological Medicine</searchLink>. Mar2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p557-569. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chi-squared+test%22">Chi-squared test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+therapy%22">Cognitive therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification+of+mental+disorders%22">Classification of mental disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+outcome+assessment%22">Health outcome assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+assessment%22">Risk assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scales+%28Weighing+instruments%29%22">Scales (Weighing instruments)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U-statistics%22">U-statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criminals+with+mental+illness%22">Criminals with mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sample+size+%28Statistics%29%22">Sample size (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effect+sizes+%28Statistics%29%22">Effect sizes (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: BackgroundCognitive skills programmes have been associated with improvements on psychometric measures and reductions in antisocial behaviour in mentally disordered offenders (MDOs). However, to date there have been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of such programmes with this population. In the first RCT of a cognitive skills programme with MDOs we aimed to determine if participation in the Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R) programme was associated with improvements in social–cognitive skills and thinking styles.MethodA total of 84 men with a primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder and a history of violence were recruited from medium-secure forensic units and allocated to receive R&R (n=44) or treatment as usual (TAU; n=40). At baseline and post-treatment interviews, participants completed questionnaires to assess social problem-solving, criminal attitudes, anger experience, blame externalizing and perspective-taking. Researchers were not blind to group status.ResultsThe R&R group demonstrated significant improvements on measures of social problem-solving relative to the TAU group, some of which were maintained at 12 months post-treatment. Only half of those allocated to receive R&R completed the full programme. In post-hoc analyses programme completers showed improvements in social problem-solving at the end of treatment and changes in criminal attitudes at 12 months post-treatment.ConclusionsAmong male MDOs, R&R participation was associated with improvements in social–cognitive skills, some of which were maintained for up to 12 months post-treatment. Our finding that programme completers do better may reflect pre-treatment patient characteristics. This study establishes that multi-site RCTs can be conducted in medium-secure forensic units. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Medicine is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=70574139 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1017/S0033291711001553 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 557 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognition Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive therapy Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification of mental disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Health outcome assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Scales (Weighing instruments) Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: U-statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Criminals with mental illness Type: general – SubjectFull: Sample size (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Effect sizes (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A multi-site randomized controlled trial of a cognitive skills programme for male mentally disordered offenders: social–cognitive outcomes. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cullen, A. E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Clarke, A. Y. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kuipers, E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hodgins, S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dean, K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fahy, T. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2012 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00332917 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 42 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychological Medicine Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |