Evaluating Multiple Oyster Reef Restoration Practices Across Space and Time in Coastal Rhode Island.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating Multiple Oyster Reef Restoration Practices Across Space and Time in Coastal Rhode Island. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Barrett, Patrick D. (AUTHOR) patrick.barrett@dem.ri.gov, Schneider, Eric G. (AUTHOR), Grabowski, Jonathan H. (AUTHOR), Hanley, Torrance C. (AUTHOR), McManus, M. Conor (AUTHOR), Helt, William (AUTHOR), Kinney, Heather (AUTHOR), Hughes, A. Randall (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Ecological Restoration. Sep2024, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p193-204. 12p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Hydrology, *Reefs, *Coral reef restoration, American oyster, Disease prevalence, Oysters |
| Abstract: | Determining the efficacy of restoration practices is critical for enhancing and rebuilding degraded ecosystems. A fundamental question in marine restoration design is whether to employ active (e.g. using living plants or oysters that form the biogenic habitat) or passive (e.g. restoring the hydrology and sediment materials at the site) restoration strategies. Furthermore, the identity of sources used in restoring biogenic habitats could influence the effectiveness of restoration efforts. We present results from two independent experimental restoration efforts designed to explore the efficacy of these different approaches for the recovery of Crassostrea virginica (eastern oyster) reef habitat. Conducted from 2015–2020 in Rhode Island, USA, the restoration experiments compared 1) passive (unseeded shell) vs. active (seeded spat on shell) restoration methods in Ninigret Pond, and 2) restored reefs seeded with hatchery sourced vs. wild oyster lineages in Quonochontaug Pond. In Quonochontaug Pond, the hatchery-sourced line exhibited greater mortality than the wild lines. Restored reefs in both projects remained viable all four years post-restoration; however, low recruitment continues to limit the long-term sustainability of restored reefs in these Rhode Island systems. Natural mortality varied spatially within each coastal pond, ranging from 33–81% per year. Across both experiments, oyster mortality increased with rising temperature, salinity, and disease prevalence. Our results suggest that utilizing active restoration with spat spawned from multiple sources, including wild populations, may improve the success of oyster restoration. Future habitat restoration efforts should consider the environmental variability associated with restoration sites and the source of restoration species during project planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Ecological Restoration is the property of University of Wisconsin Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Determining the efficacy of restoration practices is critical for enhancing and rebuilding degraded ecosystems. A fundamental question in marine restoration design is whether to employ active (e.g. using living plants or oysters that form the biogenic habitat) or passive (e.g. restoring the hydrology and sediment materials at the site) restoration strategies. Furthermore, the identity of sources used in restoring biogenic habitats could influence the effectiveness of restoration efforts. We present results from two independent experimental restoration efforts designed to explore the efficacy of these different approaches for the recovery of Crassostrea virginica (eastern oyster) reef habitat. Conducted from 2015–2020 in Rhode Island, USA, the restoration experiments compared 1) passive (unseeded shell) vs. active (seeded spat on shell) restoration methods in Ninigret Pond, and 2) restored reefs seeded with hatchery sourced vs. wild oyster lineages in Quonochontaug Pond. In Quonochontaug Pond, the hatchery-sourced line exhibited greater mortality than the wild lines. Restored reefs in both projects remained viable all four years post-restoration; however, low recruitment continues to limit the long-term sustainability of restored reefs in these Rhode Island systems. Natural mortality varied spatially within each coastal pond, ranging from 33–81% per year. Across both experiments, oyster mortality increased with rising temperature, salinity, and disease prevalence. Our results suggest that utilizing active restoration with spat spawned from multiple sources, including wild populations, may improve the success of oyster restoration. Future habitat restoration efforts should consider the environmental variability associated with restoration sites and the source of restoration species during project planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15434060 |
| DOI: | 10.3368/er.42.3.193 |
