View in EDS

Global sensitivity analysis of outputs over rice-growth process in ORYZA model.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Global sensitivity analysis of outputs over rice-growth process in ORYZA model.
Authors: Tan, Junwei1 tanjunwei@whu.edu.cn, Cui, Yuanlai1 ylcui@whu.edu, Luo, Yufeng1 yfluo@whu.edu.cn
Source: Environmental Modelling & Software. Sep2016, Vol. 83, p36-46. 11p.
Subjects: Rice farming, Sensitivity analysis, Crop management, Rice yields, Weather
Abstract: Dynamic crop models usually have a complex structure and a large number of parameters. Those parameter values usually cannot be directly measured, and they vary with crop cultivars, environmental conditions and managements. Thus, parameter estimation and model calibration are always difficult issues for crop models. Therefore, the quantification of parameter sensitivity and the identification of influential parameters are very important and useful. In this work, late-season rice was simulated with meteorological data in Nanchang, China. Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of 20 selected parameters in ORYZA_V3 using the Extended FAST method. We presented the sensitivity results for four model outputs (LAI, WAGT, WST and WSO) at four development stages and the results for yield. Meanwhile, we compared the differences among the sensitivity results for the model outputs simulated in cold, normal and hot years. The uncertainty of output variables derived from parameter variation and weather conditions were also quantified. We found that the development rates, RGRLMN and FLV0.5 had strong effects on all model outputs in all conditions, and parameters WGRMX and SPGF had relative high effects on yield in cold year. Only LAI was sensitive to ASLA. Those influential parameters had unequal effects on different outputs, and they had different effects at four development stages. With the interaction effects of parameter variation and different weather conditions, the uncertainty of model outputs varied significantly. However, the weather conditions had negligible effects on the identification of influential parameters, although they had slight effects on the ranks of the parameters' sensitivity for outputs in the panicle-formation phase and the grain-filling phase, including yield at maturity. The results suggested that the influential parameters should be recalibrated in priority and fine-tuned with higher accuracy during model calibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Environmental Modelling & Software is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Dynamic crop models usually have a complex structure and a large number of parameters. Those parameter values usually cannot be directly measured, and they vary with crop cultivars, environmental conditions and managements. Thus, parameter estimation and model calibration are always difficult issues for crop models. Therefore, the quantification of parameter sensitivity and the identification of influential parameters are very important and useful. In this work, late-season rice was simulated with meteorological data in Nanchang, China. Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of 20 selected parameters in ORYZA_V3 using the Extended FAST method. We presented the sensitivity results for four model outputs (LAI, WAGT, WST and WSO) at four development stages and the results for yield. Meanwhile, we compared the differences among the sensitivity results for the model outputs simulated in cold, normal and hot years. The uncertainty of output variables derived from parameter variation and weather conditions were also quantified. We found that the development rates, RGRLMN and FLV0.5 had strong effects on all model outputs in all conditions, and parameters WGRMX and SPGF had relative high effects on yield in cold year. Only LAI was sensitive to ASLA. Those influential parameters had unequal effects on different outputs, and they had different effects at four development stages. With the interaction effects of parameter variation and different weather conditions, the uncertainty of model outputs varied significantly. However, the weather conditions had negligible effects on the identification of influential parameters, although they had slight effects on the ranks of the parameters' sensitivity for outputs in the panicle-formation phase and the grain-filling phase, including yield at maturity. The results suggested that the influential parameters should be recalibrated in priority and fine-tuned with higher accuracy during model calibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13648152
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.001