View in EDS

Chemicals usage in stimulation processes for shale gas and deep geothermal systems: A comprehensive review and comparison.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Chemicals usage in stimulation processes for shale gas and deep geothermal systems: A comprehensive review and comparison.
Authors: Sutra, Emilie1, Spada, Matteo1, Burgherr, Peter1
Source: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. Sep2017, Vol. 77, p1-11. 11p.
Subjects: Chemicals, Shale gas, Hydraulic fracturing, Geothermal resources, Comparative method
Abstract: With the economic establishment of the shale gas exploitation, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have become nowadays common procedures, but not without any controversy. In parallel, the emergent case of deep geothermal energy systems is claimed to not have much to do with the fracking process. Through an intensive review of the available literature and data, we aim to lift the veil on the differences and similarities between shale gas and deep geothermal energy regarding the chemical substances used during the stimulation phase, as far as possible. Such a comparison appears finally not so obvious. In a general way, the effective used quantity of each chemical should not be neglected, even if advertised as being an extremely small percentage of the total stimulation fluids composition. Although some of these substances are considered purely environment/human health friendly, the diversity of potential risks associated with the hazardous chemicals can lead to severe consequences. However, the multitude of possible pathways for these risks tends to show that the main hazards are not especially or exclusively linked to the fluids injection process itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:With the economic establishment of the shale gas exploitation, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have become nowadays common procedures, but not without any controversy. In parallel, the emergent case of deep geothermal energy systems is claimed to not have much to do with the fracking process. Through an intensive review of the available literature and data, we aim to lift the veil on the differences and similarities between shale gas and deep geothermal energy regarding the chemical substances used during the stimulation phase, as far as possible. Such a comparison appears finally not so obvious. In a general way, the effective used quantity of each chemical should not be neglected, even if advertised as being an extremely small percentage of the total stimulation fluids composition. Although some of these substances are considered purely environment/human health friendly, the diversity of potential risks associated with the hazardous chemicals can lead to severe consequences. However, the multitude of possible pathways for these risks tends to show that the main hazards are not especially or exclusively linked to the fluids injection process itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13640321
DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.108