Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review: Assessing the effectiveness of anonymization in the review process. |
| Authors: |
Le Goues, C.1 clegoues@cs.cmu.edu, Brun, Y.2 brun@cs.umass.edu, Apel, S.3 apel@uni-passau.de, Berger, E.4 emery@cs.umass.edu, Khurshid, S.5 khurshid@ece.utexas.edu, Smaragdakis, Y.6 smaragd@di.uoa.gr |
| Source: |
Communications of the ACM. Jun2018, Vol. 61 Issue 6, p30-33. 4p. 1 Color Photograph, 3 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subjects: |
Scholarly peer review, Scholarly publishing, Blind experiment, Software engineering conferences, Prejudices, Prevention, Social conditions of women |
| Abstract: |
The authors present their thoughts on the effectiveness of anonymizing peer reviews in the academic publication process. They argue in favor of double-blind reviews despite the extra administrative effort required, citing examples from software engineering conferences and published papers. |
| Database: |
Engineering Source |
