View in EDS

Response of Pounding Dynamic Vibration Neutralizer Under Harmonic and Random Excitation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Response of Pounding Dynamic Vibration Neutralizer Under Harmonic and Random Excitation.
Authors: Masri, Sami F.1 masri@usc.edu, Caffrey, John P.1
Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics. Feb2019, Vol. 86 Issue 2, p1-15. 15p.
Subjects: Degrees of freedom, Relative motion, Vibration absorbers
Abstract: Exact steady-state solutions are obtained for the motion of an single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system that is provided with a highly nonlinear auxiliary mass damper (AMD), which resembles a conventional dynamic vibration neutralizer (DVN), whose relative motion with respect to the primary system is constrained to remain within a specified gap, thus operating as a "pounding DVN." This configuration of a conventional DVN with motion-limiting stops could be quite useful when a primary structure with a linear DVN is subjected to transient loads (e.g., earthquakes) that may cause excessive relative motion between the auxiliary and primary systems. Under the assumption that the motion of the nonlinear system under harmonic excitation is undergoing steady-state motion with two impacts per period of the excitation, an exact, closed-form solution is obtained for the system motion. This solution is subsequently used to develop an approximate analytical solution for the stationary response of the pounding DVN when subjected to random excitation with white spectral density and Gaussian probability distribution. Comparison between the analytically estimated rms response of the primary system and its corresponding response obtained via numerical simulation shows that the analytical estimates are quite accurate when the coupling (tuning parameters) between the primary system and the damper are weak, but only moderately accurate when the linear components of the tuning parameters are optimized. It is also shown that under nonstationary, the pounding DVN provides slightly degraded performance compared to the linear one but simultaneously limits the damper-free motion to specified design constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Applied Mechanics is the property of American Society of Mechanical Engineers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Exact steady-state solutions are obtained for the motion of an single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system that is provided with a highly nonlinear auxiliary mass damper (AMD), which resembles a conventional dynamic vibration neutralizer (DVN), whose relative motion with respect to the primary system is constrained to remain within a specified gap, thus operating as a "pounding DVN." This configuration of a conventional DVN with motion-limiting stops could be quite useful when a primary structure with a linear DVN is subjected to transient loads (e.g., earthquakes) that may cause excessive relative motion between the auxiliary and primary systems. Under the assumption that the motion of the nonlinear system under harmonic excitation is undergoing steady-state motion with two impacts per period of the excitation, an exact, closed-form solution is obtained for the system motion. This solution is subsequently used to develop an approximate analytical solution for the stationary response of the pounding DVN when subjected to random excitation with white spectral density and Gaussian probability distribution. Comparison between the analytically estimated rms response of the primary system and its corresponding response obtained via numerical simulation shows that the analytical estimates are quite accurate when the coupling (tuning parameters) between the primary system and the damper are weak, but only moderately accurate when the linear components of the tuning parameters are optimized. It is also shown that under nonstationary, the pounding DVN provides slightly degraded performance compared to the linear one but simultaneously limits the damper-free motion to specified design constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00218936
DOI:10.1115/1.4041910